English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Yes it was President Clinton who abolished it in 1996. It was replaced by TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families). The programs are essentially the same, but TANF has stricter restrictions, such as a five year limit on receiving aid.

2006-06-05 17:17:54 · answer #1 · answered by vertigohigh 2 · 0 0

President Bush signed the law that changed the Aid to Families with Dependent Children to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families handled by Administration for Children & Families.
Name change - media hype you fell for.

2006-06-05 17:21:33 · answer #2 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

Turkey has bigger stages of poverty and earnings inequality than america it relatively is likewise has a lite welfare state. those international locations are the worst of OECD individuals they're between the worst.If turkey has lots of homeless human beings that's obvious that the kin device is incapable of combating poverty to boot. i think of we could desire to continually evaluate turkey to the west ordinary instead of selectively as you have. Its laughable to call a welfare state totalitarian in comparison to Turkey. that's lots greater comparable to this type. evaluate the therapy of the Kurds, the torture of prisoners with bottles and broken glass. Similary u.s. with its lite welfare state has curtial civil liberties.Turkeys distinctive way of existence and greater conservative ecosystem is a barrier on selection for kurds women human beings and lots of others. it is comparable to premodern eu societies the place the kin became additionally reliable. it is telling approximately those tradtional kin structures. We shouldnt glorify them. they're notably lots oppressive structures which outlaw difference and homogenise the inhabitants. In the two Turkish and Western traditionalism difference is ostracised. it isn't any unconnected. "kin Values" equals the chains of traditionalism. there is threat in modernity yet i think of that the value is larger than the previos device. we could desire to continually circulate to plug this threat yet no longer return to the previous device. Are the human beings different traditionalist societies happy families? no they're additionally the state that are greater controlling and totalitarian. Take Iran as an occasion. it appears that evidently relatively that turkey desires a welfare state to handle poverty and that it imposes values and techniques of residing on its human beings lots greater suitable than western states do. while Thatcher pulled back the welfare state in england and state that there became no such element as society merely there families this inverse share didnt seem the two. in fact the slimming of english welfare observed a proliferation of crime and inequality and maximum all infant poverty. it is likewise while the state began to escalate its punitive powers

2016-12-08 07:04:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I thought it was president clinton.

2006-06-05 17:11:17 · answer #4 · answered by BonesofaTeacher 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers