English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1st of all there were many witnesses that bombs were going off in the twin towers it was physically impossible for the planes to make those CLASS A buildings collapse from kerosene when shittier buildings has fires that laster over 15 hrs and did not collapse i will not get into to much detail with that 2nd the pentagon crash was had no damage to it like a boeing 757 plane hit it it actually left the damage that a cruise missle strike hit it where are the engines from that plane 6000 tons of titanium steel on each engine vaprized in kerosene? i dont think so it is scientifically impossible and why did the fbi confiscate the tapes from the hotel and gas station that caught it all all they needed to do was reveal a tape and it would prove that it hit. IT WAS ALL SET UP oh and coincidence the plane hit the "EYMPTY" side of the pentagon. yeaaa.......enough with that what about united 93 ur going to tell me that a boeing 757 vaporized into the dirt with completely no evidence of the plane

2006-06-05 17:06:19 · 23 answers · asked by antz 1 in Politics & Government Government

instead it looked like a missle shot the ground and they dumped some old dirty metal into the hole. PLEASE WATCH LOOSE CHANGE SECOND EDITION ITS ON GOOGLE VIDEO FOR FREE TO WATCH let me know what you think ok?

2006-06-05 17:08:26 · update #1

YOU IDIOTS THERES MORE IT WAS FOR THE GOLD UNDER THE WORLD TRADE CENTER AND 6 WEEKS AFTER SILVERSTEINE BUYS THE TWIN TOWERS THIS HAPPE NDS AND HE NEVER GOT ALL HIS MONEY HUH WHY WAS THERE DUST IN DA LOBBY OF THE TRADE CENTER THAT COULDNT OF HAPPPENED FROM A PLANE DUST IS THE SIGNATURE OF HIGH EXPLOSIVES DIKS WATCH LOOSE CHANGE IT WILL CHANGE UR OPINION THERES MANY REASONS WHY HE DID THIS OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-06-05 17:14:28 · update #2

ohh can any dumb *** on this website tell me how building 7 went down when it had 2 minor internal fires and buildings in pensylvania and los angeles burned for more then 20hrs and it was a big fire to y did wtc 7 come down like it was a controlled demolition the collapse of wtc 7 was completely impossible i dont want to hear it

2006-06-05 17:23:22 · update #3

it was all bush the confession tape the pentagon all set up scientiffically impossible tradgedies happened on that day according to the OFFICIAL story watch loose change 2nd edition i guarantee it will change ur mind of what the goverment foooled most of america 2 believe all of u ppl that say it wasnt a conspiracy better look again because u cant explain how wtc 7 fell and all of that stuff so b4 u start getting all patriotic on me watch loose change on google video for free =)

2006-06-05 17:39:08 · update #4

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848 watch this seriously for all the ppl that say im dumb go kill yourself

2006-06-05 17:40:24 · update #5

http://www.pledgebank.com/loosechange

2006-06-05 17:42:09 · update #6

WOW WATCH LOOSE CHANGE I JUST POSTED THE LINK I CANT BELIEVE YOU GAY ****** AMERICANS THANK GOD IM ITALIAN

2006-06-05 17:50:36 · update #7

23 answers

You can go to Hell if you really think that we were behind the September 11th attacks.

I have a question for you: What's your favorite flavor? Do you like the regular Windex or the berry stuff? because you were obviously a window licker sitting in the back of the short bus while you were growing up. If you don't know what that means that just proves my point further

2006-06-05 17:16:45 · answer #1 · answered by PatMan 2 · 0 0

First off, if you watched the tapes as the planes hit the trade centers, part of the explosions were white flames. meaning Phosphorus!!!! Phosphorus burns white, and is a metal melting radiant heat. but also the planes were carrying "dirty bombs" Enough radioactive material thrown into phosphorus and it would take down buildings 4 times more stable and larger. the Pentagon hit was a mis-directed hit. The plane did not hit directly into the Pentagon. And have you ever been to the Pentagon and seen what it is made from? Have you the security clearances to know what safety barriers are built into the external walls of it? As for United 93 point a object in flight into a downward spiral from a in flight cruising speed of 600 mph. The drop it straight down! It's speed increase by 8 times. At that speed, anything hitting a solid immovable object is going to basical vaporize into nothing due to the fact of having full fuel tanks and another explosive device on board. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE YOU TRY SOMETHING LIKE THIS. Do some homework as in reconstruction experiments using models of same design and duplicate the circumstances.

2006-06-05 17:23:16 · answer #2 · answered by jtracer48 4 · 0 0

The impact of the plane and explosion from JET FUEL, not kerosene, caused the fire proofing material to be blasted off the steel joists. As some of us know, not you of course, steel quickly loses it tensile strength as it gets superheated. The joists began to collapse and the building "pancaked" down, as we all saw on that horrible day. That is why structural steel is encased in either concrete or fireproofing material. If the towers had reinforced concrete as its main structural members of the floor system, they may have weathered the impact.

But here's the kicker. Do you honestly think that in the era of leaks in the government, someone wouldn't have come forward by now, leaked something anything. I've seen the film, Micheal Moore would be proud.

Terrorist attacked us. Al-queda. Now go find area 51 and report back on the aliens you find.

2006-06-05 17:46:46 · answer #3 · answered by robling_dwrdesign 5 · 0 0

The towers part has already been answered by someone before me.

Who would bomb an empty section of the pentagon??? For the fun of it??? I doubt that if it was a "bombing" that they would kill thousands in the towers, but then want to spare people in the pentagon... DOUBTFUL!!!

Plus, who would shoot a missle into a random place in the ground and bury some metal into it??? And without anyone noticing??? That would be completely pointless!!!! Terrorists don't shoot at the ground, they shoot at people.

I think talking about stuff like this makes a mockery out of sep. 11, and that greatly insults me.

2006-06-05 17:15:37 · answer #4 · answered by lennyfoshenny 2 · 0 0

Why not UFO's do you all really belive this bull or do you just hate Bush that bad?

The government may have had things or material "stored" in the towers, but of course the planes caused the towers to fall, I have watched the tape of the planes hitting many times

Ie, I was near the pentagon that day, it was a airplane and of course the tapes were taken, it is called evidence, had it been a robbery, they tapes would have been taken.

2006-06-05 17:12:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The plane shattered when it hit the columns within the building. After the plane stripped the fire-retardant off the columns, the fires melted the columns causing the collapse of the building. Had the fire retardant not been stripped off, the buildings would have had a better chance to survive (not collapse). Mystery solved.

2006-06-05 17:11:11 · answer #6 · answered by Well Endowed 1 · 0 0

the 11 attacks that got here about lower than Bush were quick, unpredicted hits the position there became no time or probability for a reaction. And the final public of those killed in those attacks were close by guards, no longer the ambassadors themselves. In Benghazi, the authorities became informed by ability of the individuals there that they feared an attack became coming and requested help, and that help not in any respect arrived... Its no longer the attacks that are troubling

2016-12-06 10:10:08 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Bush is not yet a president when Pope John Paul II visited here in the Philippines during World Youth Day in the 90's,one of the suspected assassin that was caught was deported back to his country because of luck of evidence even though he admitted being one who is planning to destroy the twin tower because the local police think its imposible.But after the 9/11 he was recognized as one of the terrorist.

2006-06-06 03:04:40 · answer #8 · answered by toty 1 · 0 0

No, GW was not behind the attacks. Your information is wrong. The side of the pentigon that got hit was under construction, but it was not empty, a few people inside did get killed. And no, none of the planes vaporized, all had wreckage.

2006-06-05 17:43:56 · answer #9 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0 0

Is there any reason bush would do this, besides complete mental instability? You're going out on a limb here. And i'd hope the american population has more sense than to elect someone mentally ill.

2006-06-05 17:11:25 · answer #10 · answered by karl 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers