Check out these two questions:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjcNGMa46WkHQ70dTmJfot_sy6IX?qid=1006060411036
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlC41Sr29E23wyFXg0Ze9H3sy6IX?qid=1006060410461
If these polls are representative, most people think President Bush is at least as bad as Osama bin Laden, but still think he was right to go to war. Can anyone explain this apparent discrepancy?
2006-06-05 15:41:07 · 5 answers · asked by McNeef 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
These are not scientific polls, it is not a controlled cross section but rather it depends who is on at the time. I think that the support for the war is low also. From the scientific polls.
2006-06-05 16:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know why people think it was right to go into Iraq. Maybe brainwashed and scared of "the terrorist threat". I don't think these people pay attention. Not really saying that it was a horrible thing to do to take out Saddaam but more on the priorities of the U.S. and the world in general. There were far higher threats to us and much higher priorities for the world than Iraq...
2006-06-05 16:05:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
love the president hate all war but sometimes you got to fight to live
2006-06-05 16:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by MIKE B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I DON'T SUPPORT BUSH OR HIS ELECTIVE WAR OF CHOICE BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE.
2006-06-05 15:56:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mind F******
2006-06-05 15:45:20 · answer #5 · answered by Jo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋