o wait. yea he is
2006-06-05 14:43:59 · 18 answers · asked by phillyfan11 1 in Sports ➔ Baseball
He's decent but I wouldn't say he was the greatest. Not even close to being the greatest. In my opinion Pete Rose was the greatest player on earth. But i do have a biased opinion because I love the Cincinnati Reds
2006-06-05 15:09:06 · answer #1 · answered by Philip 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While Rollins is certainly a good player, he is probably not in the top 50 players in the game right now....
2006-06-05 21:50:23 · answer #2 · answered by Coupe60 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, j.ro isn't even the greatest shortstop on the face of the earth (that would be ozzie smith, retired and derek jeter, active). a lot of great players would have to check out before j.ro could ever be called that.
2006-06-05 23:08:14 · answer #3 · answered by geewhizzed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While Rollins is an excellent ballplayer, the "best on Earth" is overstating it just a bit.
2006-06-05 23:32:15 · answer #4 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he's not the greatest player on Earth.
2006-06-05 22:53:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batting .248. .311 On Base Percentage. Slugging .383. 5 HR's, 15 RBI's.
In other words, NNNNNOOOOO!!!!!
2006-06-05 22:28:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anon28 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conversation about best player in da league is irrevelant if Pujols isnt mentioned
2006-06-05 22:44:59 · answer #7 · answered by Luigi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Luigi is right - despite being injured right now, Albert Pujols is one of the best in the game at this point.
2006-06-05 23:11:10 · answer #8 · answered by wheezer_april_4th_1966 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would disagree
he is a great player but he is a streaky hitter. He has good speed and nice strength. He has good power but at times his slumps are long.
2006-06-05 21:47:03 · answer #9 · answered by Boom!!! Shock A Locka 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely not!
a singles hitter with some speed cannot be considered in the same breath with the likes of V. Guerrero or a. puljos.
2006-06-05 23:56:45 · answer #10 · answered by Charles C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋