The following is an interesting little factoid you may interested in:
June 4, 2006 -- More on George W. Bush's "Sanctity of Marriage" gay marriage constitutional ban.
George W. Bush's marital problems have just taken another turn for the worse. Apparently, Mr. Bush has not only engaged in an extra-marital affair with a member of the opposite sex who is also a senior member of his Cabinet, but also a member of the same sex. WMR received the following release this morning from Leola McConnell, Democratic candidate for Governor of Nevada (who has been endorsed by WMR). McConnell is a one-time professional dominatrix.
"President Bush's speech to the nation Monday. If he doesn't say he's a gay American or at the least a bisexual one then he shouldn't be making one at all. And the notion that it would be in regards to writing bigotry into our nation's Constitution is reprehensible. Too bad it isn't me doing the rebuttal because in 1984, I watched him perform (with the enthusiasm of homosexual male who had done this many times before) a homosexual act on another man, namely Victor Ashe. Victor Ashe is the current Ambassador to the nation of Poland who should also come out like former Governor McGreevey of New Jersey and admit to being a gay American. Other homo-erotic acts were also performed by then private citizen George Bush because I performed one of them on him personally.
I am the woman this website (bushssecretlifein84.tripod.com) speaks of that has been posted on the net nearly two years now. None of this would be the business of anyone but President Bush's little ruse to save his failed presidency by using DOMA [Defense of Marriage Act] to divide Americans one from the other has to be exposed as the act of a desperate closeted homosexual man. The only crime in being GLBT is in the hiding. The President needs to come clean with the American people about his own past sexual behavior before he tries to besmirch the humanity of people in search of sincerely committing to the same bonds of matrimony he's afforded. He violated his own vows of monogamy having a homosexual affair with a long time family friend of whom his wife had no knowledge. His hypocrisy seems to know no bounds.
I had planned to run for governor of Nevada without going into any of this but his planned nationally televised address to the nation makes it necessary for me to address his attempt at division in as public a way as he picked to try this Bushification of reality regarding same sex marriages.
Sincerely,
Leola McConnell
Liberal Democratic candidate for Governor of Nevada
--------------------------------------
Now, aint this special!?
2006-06-05 13:30:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by isacoydog 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Is it not a proud thing to do, come out of the Closet and say that i am guy and be proud of saying so. Especially in this day and age.
Let me tell you something laddie i am not rich, and not even from the USA. But i still have a right to like and admire who ever the hell i want. And further more from your other answers from previous questions. you have not the right to tell anyone else to lighten up with their attitude. until you Learn to do so yourself.
2006-06-06 01:15:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt the religious right would. The very rich, maybe. There's probably plenty of them hiding in the closet who wouldn't mind if he was a homo.
As a blue collar Repug pond scum, I would still support him, as long as I don't have to actually see him kissing another guy.
2006-06-05 13:35:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by meathead76 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of he might pretend like no longer something became incorrect...then he might say he became wearing pants. Later, the Conservative media might say that the Liberals have been attacking him and making fake accusations. the subsequent time he might handle the rustic he might then say that he became wearing pants and that the accusations have been basically political. Then after the Video tape is released he might then say that his pants have been stolen by ability of Alquida! And that he would not be waiting to talk it till ultimately after the study. After the study concluded that he did no longer plan to handle the rustic exact by ability of putting on pants, he might then ultimately be question approximately no longer wearing pants, right here his reaction could be that it became interior the previous, and that would not be commenting on that situation or he might in all hazard cries it is government PRIVILEGE!
2016-10-30 07:06:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All I can say is maybe he should stay in that closet and someone can give him a bungie. That is if the closet has a hanger bar in it LOL
2006-06-05 17:30:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by ₦âħí»€G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing would surprise me at this point. Sounds like a few of that 29 % are whining right here.
2006-06-05 13:46:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by shocktrooper342003 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I would. Because there is way more to him than that. I am poor not rich. We could all have fun here if no one kept trying to change us over to their way of thinking. Why can't you let us be who we are, but still debate?
2006-06-05 13:45:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must have high hopes that the world will turn into Utopia too. The president and His wife have a good marriage and at their age they do not change brands.
2006-06-05 13:23:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by old codger 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you SOME KIND OF A NUT?
How dare you make such a remark about OUR president
Shame on you
I'll bet your parents don't know your slandering our president!
I'm forwarding this comment to the secret service, they may find you and your comments useful in your procession
2006-06-05 13:25:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pobept 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope he did that will make my day if Clinton almost got impeached with his fling i would love to see what would happen to ALMIGHTY BUSH!
2006-06-05 13:34:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Flower child 2
·
0⤊
0⤋