Why does a country with endless oil need nuclear power?

Question

Does peaceful use of a nuclear stuff include having a means to keep other nations (some of whom woudl be aggressive) at bay?

Answer 1

no such thing as endless oil. Sooner or later will run out.

Answer 2

We DO NOT need Nuclear power! www.permanentenergy.com shows a pollution free fuel-less way to make all the power the US or the world could ever use. Because it is fuel-less the electric power would be cheaper than nuclear or any fueled process. Fuel for an electric power plant runs more $30 billion over the plants 25/30 year life. Nuclear power has 25,000 year storage problem that will cost more that $30 billion per year for 25,000 years. This will make Nuclear THE most expensive electric power of all time.

Answer 3

Every nation has the right to nuclear power. It's just that the world as a whole is saying that some nations pose a significant threat to the stability of the world by posessing nuclear power in the form of weapons. Therefore, rather than allow them to pose this threat, we will choose to stop them before unavoidable world damage and chaos can be begun.

Answer 4

They are using that as an arugument to become more than a backward country that no one cares about. The oil issue will fade and then they will go back to being nothing. Nuclear power has its advantages and is a cleaner soultion to buring all the oil but other countries can supply them with fuel without their processing it.

Answer 5

1. oil isn't endless,
2. Nuclear power is cheaper, saner, safer, etc.
3. Theres no reason to believe that they are after nukes, we have
and can have suspicions, but there is not a single shred of evidence that shows that Iran is after anything more than nuclear power.

Answer 6

interior the 70's, lower than Labour, there have been ability outages, mass strikes via too functional unions, a three day operating week, and individuals calling us 'the Sickman of Europe.' no longer precisely tremendous. interior the 80's there became extreme employment actual...yet no longer in basic terms interior the united kingdom. As now, there became a international recession. Thatcher ought to look very harsh, I admit, yet coal mines, deliver progression industries collapsed , with the same closures all over the realm! My brother in Canada became a welder at a dockyard there, became laid off there,and not in any respect had a good pastime back thereafter (and became unemployed for years.) The early ninety's Labou regarded ok, yet as standard it superior to mismanagement, consisting of out of control mass migration adversarial to the want of the individuals, and what looked as if it would many a coverage that favoured the shiftless and the workshy-ie favouring a not in any respect-had-a-pastime woman fecklessly popping out infant after infant, at the same time as providing no information to a low income yet hardworking, good men/women those who were smart sufficient to apply birth control and had some understand for themselves and did not imagine society owed them a residing. I truly imagine if Labour has continued in ability, the rustic ought to have by ability of now lengthy previous bust land had to be bailed out like Greece, eire etc.. That reported, the Conservatives are fairly garbage too, and look getting all of it incorrect.

Answer 7

Iran is not after nuclear power. his goal is nuclear weapons. this man is ...........lets just say he's unstable. he has said something on the lines that in the next 2 to 3 years he will eradicate the earth. and if you don't come to Islam you must be killed

Answer 8

Nuclear power is cleaner and more efficient (I think), and sure, I don't see why Iran shouldn't have nukes. If a violent pseudo country like Israel can have them, why not Iran?

Answer 9

Well it could sell oil ,but if your smart like Norway you save it is very possible there made of many different things. Oil is natural resorse. Neclear power is evil it kills many.

Answer 10

The oil supply is Not endless.