English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-05 12:46:48 · 29 answers · asked by pumpkin 2 in Politics & Government Politics

29 answers

God help us all.......

2006-06-05 12:49:19 · answer #1 · answered by Einstein 7 · 1 3

I think it would be just fine. Probably a lot prettier, like instead of the White House it could be the Pink house with white trim or something.

Just joking. There would be no difference. Except the Bush jokes would be funnier.

Okay, I am sorry. I mean -- really now -- women can be just as stupid as men. It's just that they have different toys. Oh, and Fishing and Football would likely be illegal.

DANG IT! I'm trying to be SERIOUS here. IT WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT!!!! GET IT????? JUST MIGHT BE A LITTLE TENSE EVERY MONTH..... OH MY G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I give up.

2006-06-05 12:54:17 · answer #2 · answered by OriginalSim 3 · 0 0

Aren't we rulling it already? rulling is not always being in the important and recognized places, but being able to influence lots of people so that they make what we want. If men haven't already destroyed themselves with bombs and things like that is because ther usually is a woman next to them reminding that that is not a solution. Women are great with feelings, men with actions. So, you could say that women think, men act. It is difficult for women to act, and difficult for men to think in the correct way, so, sexes are made to complement each other

2006-06-05 12:53:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nothing would be different. When women first got the right to vote they didn't make much of a difference politically because they voted similarly to men. This just shows how similar men and women are.

2006-06-05 12:50:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous 2 · 0 0

hmmm, women in control....lets think about this for a moment....

hillary clinton as prez, with access to a nuke button....on pms

in thr grander scheme of things, if all women ruled the world...with pms... you men would be in cages outside in the weather, hungry, and only unlocked when we had a jar that needed to be opened, a car that needed to be worked on, a house that needed to be painted, or anything else women would be afraid to do with their fake nails.

2006-06-05 12:55:26 · answer #5 · answered by kristeena911 4 · 0 0

Look at Margeret Thatcher, tell me the world would last even one month. The woman was threatining to use nuclear force on Argentina for god's sake.

2006-06-05 13:08:33 · answer #6 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0 0

To tell u the true i think it would be bad girls or woman don't get along now it will be big if they ruled the city..don't u think so??

2006-06-05 12:51:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Come the day!!!!! We will have order in the house! A much better world.

2006-06-05 12:49:48 · answer #8 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 1 0

A better world.

2006-06-05 12:56:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They already have quite a lot of power. Who do you think shapes the minds of men...their mother usually.

2006-06-05 13:05:00 · answer #10 · answered by Cherokee_pride 3 · 0 0

the world would be a much more peaceful place to live, and all men would be in chains where they rightfully belong. lol

2006-06-05 15:40:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers