English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

no, it would slow the process down so bad you would never get answers, they trust to report what needsa reporting

2006-06-05 12:10:27 · answer #1 · answered by butchell 6 · 0 0

Question moderation would require too much time (human intervention) to screen everything. They rely on us (after the fact) to report abuse. Since at that point, when abuse has been reported, it does require human intervention to review the case, there should be some reward (maybe a few points) for reporting abuse, which seems to be a hot topic on Y!Answers now and then. Otherwise nobody will bother to report abuse and it might only get worse. Still, I'd rather see a few idiotic questions fly by than have the whole works slowed down by a screening process... Just my $0.02

2006-06-05 19:19:19 · answer #2 · answered by networkmaster 5 · 0 0

That would be retarded because there can only be so many mods on a site, and with a ton of questions, it could take weeks for your question to get posted. And if you still don't understand, learn to read.

2006-06-05 19:46:39 · answer #3 · answered by scooter 4 · 0 0

That would require a lot of "horsepower".

Thousands of questions every hour would be difficult to audit & analyze.

2006-06-05 19:02:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers