English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

HELLO!
hey!america.
we wanna have that .so maybe weapons.
who r u that decide what we must do & what we musnt.why do you interfere in our country.
all of us ONLY do what we want.
no other can say any thing for our peaceful works.
why u have that?u even have alot of nuclear weapons.u destroyed japan.
how u can forget that?what a huge crime.
u may say none of ur business.
then i say (to the people who are against iran peaceful works)u LOUDLY :NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS
if u have legal speak i listen...

2006-06-05 10:28:19 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

40 answers

Iranians people can have nuclear energy but also they need freedom they want to have a right to talk and write and behave freely. these things are more important than having nuclear energy.aren't they.

all nations around the world have right to have and use it peacefully.but Iran had show that want it for other things

2006-06-16 05:36:40 · answer #1 · answered by kiana h 2 · 3 1

I think you are missing the point. By possessing Nuclear Weapons, Iran will threaten not only the peace of the Middle East but the whole world... and that can not be allowed to happen for the good of mankind. Even If Iran merely wants nuclear power to provide for her own needs, then that is an entirely different matter and it SHOULD be their own decision, but it can not be.

This would be a real problem, however, in that the nuclear fuel for a reactor can be used to make a small device... I know because I was involved in the testing of 3 such devices by the British in the early 1960's (I think it was 1962 or 1963). Admittedly, they were low yield but they were still nuclear weapons.

Iran has as much to lose as everyone else if not more, however. The people in the West are so paranoid about another attack inside their borders that, if Iran was to develop a small device and then give it to a terrorist group who set off in a Western city, the repercussions from this act would be the total destruction of Iran... complete and total destruction of everything and everyone in the country. Your part of the desert would not be habitable for a couple of hundred years.

Do you really want to see that happen. I certainly don't but the possibility that it COULD happen if Iran gets nuclear weapons scares the daylights out of me and I hope the day never comes when that happens.

2006-06-19 07:44:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hello, Iran!
I am an American citizen and I personally don't care if Iran attains nuclear power, or nuclear weapons. One warhead on one of our submarines could blow any country into dust, and we have probably the most nuclear weapons in the world, yet our "leaders" think they have the right to dictate what the rest of the world can do because our "leaders" think they know what's best for everybody in the world. The trouble is, for the talk they talk, they only look at the world through a narrow spectrum. If you in Iran attatin nuclear weaponry, your leaders won't be likely to use it, unless they have suicidal wishes. However, the threat of the use of your nuclear weaponry would be a strong deterrent to any nation that threatened direct force against you. I just hope that if your country goes nuclear, you don't have any meltdowns like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. If a nuclear facility melts down, no one can live on that land--and for miles around--again for a very long time, if ever.

2006-06-18 21:43:24 · answer #3 · answered by Princess Toadstoolie 3 · 0 0

Here are the facts

1. Nuclear NON PROLIFERATION is the idea that all nations should not make nuclear weapons, including Iran and the US. We already had ours BEFORE the treaty, and have since stopped making them. You're country should too. This treaty was created as a result of the destruction in Japan and the Cold War. Of course your radical government probably doesn't let you learn the full truths of history, and other facts, so here is some more.

2. Your radical government want's to wipe countries off the map, and makes no effort to hide that fact. They are irresponsible and cannot be trusted to making their own nuclear material.

3. I remember an offer by Russia to make nuclear fuel for you so that you can have nuclear power (something no one is opposed to) and your radical, irresponsible government turned this offer down! Now why do you think they did that? I'll tell you, because they want to make and use nuclear weapons.

4. The U.N. is the worlds "governing" body, and the U.N. has said that Iran must not create nuclear fuel. Since we are a member of the U.N. ( and the largest contributer to the U.N.) it is our business.

These are the facts. Your government probably doesn't allow you get all the facts, so of course I don't blame you for not knowing. As you can see in the other posts, alot of people here in the U.S. ignore the facts they are given. Their ignorance is their own fault.

2006-06-18 17:50:05 · answer #4 · answered by cracka 2 · 0 0

I am one of the most tolerant people I know. I'm a multi-ethnic person that was tugged by two religions and decided that they were both wrong. I came to an open minded philosophy based on the golden rule of "Do unto others..." "A tree hugging Hippy" you could call me.

I'm also a New Yorker who experienced the WTC incident on 9-11.


Here is an enemy I didn't know I had until it was too late, attacking ME! The tree huggin' Hippy. What am I supposed to think? I don't have to tell you that the first thought on my mind was revenge. I was screaming Nuke the bastards! I didn't know who to Nuke though. within a week, I came to my senses and realized that two wrongs don't make a right. However if there is a way for me to prevent an enemy from causing harm to me. I'm inclined to go for it.

Under no circumstances should any Fundamentalist Government controlling a Nation be allowed to have potentially dooming technology towards another nation. The Arab Nations are unpredictable, or rather "All-too-predicatable".

Find some other source of power.

And you shall not be allowed to lift your sword again.

2006-06-07 00:33:04 · answer #5 · answered by Swampy 3 · 0 0

Nuclear power has a 25,000 year storage problem for the spent fuel. The real cost for Nuclear power is over $500 p hr. Do you want over $500 p hr electricity? Do you want your grandchildren's grandchildren to have pay over $500 p hr for electricity. There are weapons that are just as powerful but not radioactive why not use them instead. If there is a Nuclear accident and your spent fuel gets into the water do you want your children to drink radioactive water? Should everyone have to drink radioactive water because of your mistake! The water is the water it's the same water everywhere. You think we are against you haveing Nuclear power? That's not true people in the know DO NOT want anyone to have Nuclear power. The Russians have poisoned the water enough we DO NOT need any more radiation in the water or the air period.

2006-06-05 16:41:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

My father helped build many nuclear power plants in the United States in the 1970's. He never answered the singlemost important question with regard to nuclear power:

What do you do with the byproducts?

Nuclear power is perceived as cheap, until you see the problems out at the Hanford facility out West, where the storage tanks for the waste are leaking and coming very close to getting into the Columbia River. You can't just bury the waste in the ground and make it someone else's problem for very long. That's a naive belief.

I'm guessing you're Iranian. My advice to you is, continue your English studies and talk your theocrats into wind and solar power.

2006-06-05 10:43:58 · answer #7 · answered by jpspencer1966 3 · 0 0

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A suicide bomber killed at least 10 people inside a Shi'ite mosque in Baghdad on Friday, police said, a day after the national security adviser said al Qaeda's days are numbered in Iraq.

ADVERTISEMENT

He blew himself up as worshippers gathered for prayers at the Buratha mosque, an old site which is revered by Shi'ites. Twenty-five people were wounded.

It was the type of violence that the new leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, who succeeded the slain Abu Musab al-Zarqawi last week, had vowed to maintain as part of a war against Iraq's Shi'ites and the U.S.-backed government.

Mosque guard Abdullah Hussein said the attack was carried out by a suicide bomber who had hidden explosives

2006-06-16 03:57:28 · answer #8 · answered by steven1975 2 · 0 0

You are from Iran?
I have no problem with your country having nuclear energy...it is just that your leader is an idiot & says a lot of inflammitory things such as wiping Israel off the face of the map.
Do you not understand that whether you like it or not, the Jews are God's chosen people? You are wise to defend them...the Lord Jesus will be back.

2006-06-17 15:31:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

sup,
hey, iran.
Yeah we gots a problem
you dumb as we are.
you too believe your presidents lies.
he same like bush want war so he can be big shot.
why u need nuclear power? U only want weapon.
we blow up japan, big mistake, we no want you make big mistake too.
U use regular electricity, u not need nuclear, u not have much usage.

(Translation)
Your President is a liar, he wants weapons so he can be a "World Power". The problem is that he is an idiot. Yes, we did explode atomic bombs in Japan 60 years ago, we have learned and don't want someone else making that mistake. I really wish you could be trusted with Nuclear Power, but Nobody on the planet thinks you can be except your idiot president and his cowardly followers.

2006-06-19 05:59:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The majority of American people do not currently agree with our President on the policies of handling interference in your governments politics. That said, you as a people, are not making it easy by allowing your government officials to threaten and bully our Government.
Generally speaking, we as a people do not care one way or another if you pursue a nucleur policy for the creation of energy. We would not care if you developed nucleur weapons either, except that you have publicly threatened to destroy us. That makes us uneasy.
Also it needs to be said that our country has not had much success with nucleur energy to provide power. It has been a great waste of money and time. We are now pursuing other sources of power. Perhaps you might consider becoming more educated about our country and our problems and needs, as I will do about yours.

2006-06-16 05:43:46 · answer #11 · answered by Thomas Hoey 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers