Agent 甲 帶我睇樓,但冇簽睇樓紙, 而家我想搵另一間代理買同一單位 (未夠 3 個月),
請問Agent 甲有冇權收佣 ?
2006-12-13 18:25:57 · 5 個解答 · 發問者 ? 2 in 商業與財經 ➔ 租賃與房地產
當然冇權收佣，理論上冇簽睇樓紙等同佢冇帶你睇過樓，香港地講法律，如果唔係就唔使樣樣野都白紙黑字寫淸楚，唔係口講口賠，所以唔使理會佢。
但係道義上就唔係咁啱數，要睇下佢冇同你簽睇樓紙係咩原因，忘記咗?趕時間?熟客?朋友? 話晒人地都叫做付出過ma.
Anyway唔比佣金佢你絶對唔需要付上法律責任
2006-12-14 08:56:43 · answer #1 · answered by Kwok Leung 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
如果講法律, Agent A甲是絕對冇權收佣的, 如果他是持牌地產代理, 地產監管局是規定睇樓前一定要簽睇樓紙的, 但好多細行, 唔知佢地有心定冇意, 佢地係完全唔簽的???
睇樓紙的用途, 是大家訂立的合約, 駛唔駛比佣, 比幾多佣, 幾時比佣, 大家有冇利益衝突都要申報的, 咁重要的文件點解唔簽? 如果有乜爭拗, 搵上法庭就係證據。
如果Agent A要收你佣, 你是可以到地產監管局投訴的。
但一般的地產舖在地區上可能有點地區勢力, 你要人做左野, 你唔比佣, 日後買左層樓, 出入都要小心D, 唔知會唔會有冇意外會發生!
2006-12-15 04:37:31 · answer #2 · answered by GOHO 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
theoritically he can offer comission from u if u really buy the flat he had bring u up and see
however, it's hard to prove cause u haven't sign the "documents"
finding another agent to see the same flat is sure OK
2006-12-14 13:51:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
我覺得
冇簽睇樓紙應該沒問題,
簽睇樓紙應該是在單位成功賣出, 而被 agent 發現時之追佣証明
其實你可以試下問agent, 睇樓紙有何作用, 如果我幫你簽左睇樓紙, 又幫另一個 agent 買會點 ? 如果沒簽睇樓紙, 又幫另一個 agent 買會點 ?
* 記住唔好同佢講, 找過 Agent 甲 冇簽睇樓紙, 而家 找你去看, 幫你買同一單位. 你當好奇隨便問下 . ( ^ . ^ )
2006-12-13 18:40:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course you can find another agent to buy a same flat if Agent 甲 帶睇樓,但冇簽睇樓紙.
and Agent 甲 is absolute 冇權收佣 because Agent 甲 is too lazy. I had same experience, it is absolutely no problem. 200% no problem.
2006-12-15 19:31:41 補充：
唔簽睇樓紙, 只有一個原因,就係懶! 懶係要付出代價的. Agent 帶客睇樓, 成日唔關門窗, 業主的損失, 一樣好難追討!!!
2006-12-13 18:31:50 · answer #5 · answered by Ben 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋