【拜託】請英文強的人幫忙˙不要翻譯軟體翻的

Question

˙拜託 ~ 請英文好的人幫我翻這一小段
˙請不要使用翻譯軟體，因為我用過，就是因為翻的不好才來知識發問
˙這翻譯真的很緊急，拜託大家了。謝謝 ~
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A borrower who knows the kind of covenants that the lender is most likely to propose will be able to devise a strategy to defuse the most onerous of these covenants. You know that the lender will propose covenants that will restrict the use of the firm’s cash flow, and that it will try to regulate the firm’s strategy, however this term applies to the firm in question. Protecting the balance sheet and preserving the firm’s assets will also be in the mind of the potential lender. So how is the firm going to respond to this frontal attack that the lender will, undoubtedly, mount? To respond to this, the borrower must seriously analyze his or her strengths and weaknesses. Is the firm’s strength its Balance Sheet or its cash flow? If both are strong fine, but if not, which is stronger?

Answer 1

A borrower who knows the kind of covenants that the lender is most likely to propose will be able to devise a strategy to defuse the most onerous of these covenants. You know that the lender will propose covenants that will restrict the use of the firm’s cash flow, and that it will try to regulate the firm’s strategy, however this term applies to the firm in question. Protecting the balance sheet and preserving the firm’s assets will also be in the mind of the potential lender. So how is the firm going to respond to this frontal attack that the lender will, undoubtedly, mount? To respond to this, the borrower must seriously analyze his or her strengths and weaknesses. Is the firm’s strength its Balance Sheet or its cash flow? If both are strong fine, but if not, which is stronger?
借方知道貸方立這種契約的可能性.是想要提出一個可以不必負擔這契約內麻煩的義務,貸方可能限制資金的使用.並且制定公司的運作策略.但是公司考慮是否接受這條件.貸方顧慮到資產負債表以及保護公司的資產.所以公司會對這樣的危機採取什麼的做法?無疑地是要採取攻式.也因此,借方必須仔細地方分析事情的優勢與劣勢.公司的優勢是資產負債表或是資金? 若是兩者皆是優勢那到還好,但若不是,兩者又是哪一個較重要呢?