English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
所有分類

自己也有翻過
不過不知道對不對
請英文好的大大幫我看
>< 禁用 翻譯機
有的不太會
希望大大可以幫我翻譯一下
希望越簡單越好 用字不要太深



1.最常被人們用來做皮草大衣的動物有鱷魚、兔子、狐狸等等
The animals that are most commonly used to make furs are: cayman, racoons,rabbits and foxes.


2.現在在動物保護人士的建議下,人們漸漸的以人工皮草來代替動物皮草。
Now a days under animal protections public figures advices, people are starting to use man-made furs instead of animal furs.

3.因為有些人覺得身穿皮草大衣可以突顯出他們的身分地位。
Because some people thinks that wearing animal fur can show their status better.

4.有人認為只要皮草的來源是合法的,那穿皮草並非是虐待動物
Someone think so long as leather source of grass legal, wear leather
grass to maltreat animal then .

5.也有人說其他被宰食的動物還不是一樣痛苦?難道我們能不吃肉嗎?既然不能,那又何必斤斤計較皮草該不該穿?
Are not other animals which is killed the food still the same agony?
Can we not eat the meat? Since can't,why it will be that worry about
petty gain or loss being leather grass not should wearing?


6.只要不是宰殺稀有的保育類動物.基本上是沒關係的
So long as does not slaughter the scarce child care animal. Do not
matter basically .


7.剝皮本來就是很殘酷性的事實,這與合不合法進口無關.
.It skins to be getting cruel fact very actually, this with legal to
is it have nothing to do to import.

8.動物不會給自己貼上「保育類」與「非保育類」的標籤。
動物保護,重視的是牠們有沒有受到尊重,而非數量與種類來看.
Last ' child cares ' animal and ' for child cares ' label. The animal
protects, that was paid attention to is whether they have been
respected, but not the quantity and kind are come to see.


9.最後 不論是反對者或支持者都有自己的理念
所以我們不能說誰對誰錯

2007-12-18 16:28:47 · 2 個解答 · 發問者 Anonymous in 社會與文化 語言

10. 我們生活中有很多東西都跟動物有關
但是在剝奪這些動物生命之前我們是否有想過
那些動物的痛苦呢?

今天我們的主題就講到關於人類使用動物的地方有哪些?

2007-12-18 18:41:12 · update #1

2 個解答

1.最常被人們用來做皮草大衣的動物有鱷魚、兔子、狐狸等等
Fur coats are largely demanded from animals as follow: cayman, racoon, hare , fox, etc.

2.現在在動物保護人士的建議下,人們漸漸的以人工皮草來代替動物皮草。
Nowadays, according to the suggestion from animal protection society, people begin to take more man-made furs instead of animal furs.

3.因為有些人覺得身穿皮草大衣可以突顯出他們的身分地位。
Because someone think that furs shows off their better position .

4.有人認為只要皮草的來源是合法的,那穿皮草並非是虐待動物
Someone think that as long as the sources are legal, wearing them has nothing to do with animal abuse.

5.也有人說其他被宰食的動物還不是一樣痛苦?難道我們能不吃肉嗎?既然不能,那又何必斤斤計較皮草該不該穿?
Aren't you think the other animals being killed for food , have the same agony?
Why shouldn't we eat meat? If you eat, why do you have the right to say wearing furs is quilty?


6.只要不是宰殺稀有的保育類動物.基本上是沒關係的
You'd better not slaughter the dissapearing animal.



7.剝皮本來就是很殘酷性的事實,這與合不合法進口無關.
Needless to mention the law, it is cruel and inhumane to skin animals.


8.動物不會給自己貼上「保育類」與「非保育類」的標籤。
動物保護,重視的是牠們有沒有受到尊重,而非數量與種類來看.
Animals never say whether they are " protected " or " non-protected"
The most important thing is what if we human being respect all of the lives on the earth.



9.最後 不論是反對者或支持者都有自己的理念
所以我們不能說誰對誰錯
It is too early to jump into conclusions.

2007-12-18 23:41:12 補充

10. 我們生活中有很多東西都跟動物有關
但是在剝奪這些動物生命之前我們是否有想過
那些動物的痛苦呢?
Animals are widely influent our daily lives.
Have you ever thought of our having done so much harm on animals?

今天我們的主題就講到關於人類使用動物的地方有哪些?
That is what I want to say today.

2007-12-19 08:50:12 · answer #1 · answered by Ahoo 7 · 0 0

沒關係啦~點數不是問題!只要有顆肯學習的心~相信大家都很願意幫您的^^加油加油!!

2007-12-20 04:54:48 · answer #2 · answered by vj 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers