English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
所有分類

1.The beliefs that inspired its construction have long since died out,but the Pyramid remains standing.
這句的that示代替beliefsㄇ
that引導的是形容詞子句
可以解析一下這整句嗎~有點複雜
還有這句的意思


2.Built by order of the Pharaoh Khufu in the 26th century B.c., the largest Pyramid of Giza is the largest Egyptian pyramid .
"Built by order of the Pharaoh Khufu in the 26th century B.c.,"
這句怎麼開頭就是動詞
如果這句是片語(不可有主詞和動詞)的話應該寫成building by order......
還是這句是祈使句
好複雜喔~~h-e-l-p

3.Founded in 1870 by FrederickAugust Otto Schwarz,FAO Schwarz has delighted children for more than a century.
為什麼開頭是動詞
不可以寫It is founded in 1870......嗎

2007-06-04 14:35:28 · 7 個解答 · 發問者 ss 2 in 社會與文化 語言

陸續會有問題po進來
請高手解答~~謝

2007-06-04 14:37:23 · update #1

to hobo:問題2和3式分詞構句
那原來ㄉ句子
2.it is built/it was built by order of the....
3.It is founded in 1870......
是醬ㄇ^^

2007-06-05 19:04:37 · update #2

這裡有幾ㄍ分詞構句ㄉ問題
Being seated at the table, he was waiting for her.
如果不管分詞構句,
Seated at the table, he was waiting for her.
=he seated at the table,he was waiting for her.嗎

在分詞構句中being 可省略
那Being caught in the rain, he got a cold.
這句being是不是不能省,因為這句是被動

2007-06-05 19:05:14 · update #3

As he was seen by the policeman, he ran away.
可以寫As he saw by the policeman, he ran away.嗎

You should have your hair cut.
可以寫You should have cut your hair嗎
或是 You should have that your hair cut嗎

誰來回答我ㄉ問題~~拜託

2007-06-05 19:05:33 · update #4

文法問題too to 和 there is /are
to hobo~~在我標題"文法問題too to 和 there is /are"
有針對你回答ㄉ問題作提問...在意見010 和011中
可否請你上去做回答~~~拜託你ㄌ 還有謝謝你ㄉ熱心

2007-06-06 11:05:57 · update #5

The beliefs that inspired its construction have long since died out,but the Pyramid remains standing
這句的意思是...

2007-06-06 11:06:49 · update #6

to hobo
你ㄉ回答--Built by order of the Pharaoh Khufu in the 26th century B.c., the largest Pyramid of Giza is the largest Egyptian pyramid .
除了應該要用過去式外,和2句個少了連接詞連接"句子"外,你說的對
這句ㄉ原來句型應該怎麼寫
前面那句原來句型ㄉ動詞應該是現在式(前後詞性要一致)

2007-06-06 11:22:08 · update #7

As he was seen by the policeman, he ran away.
-->不對,上一句是被動,下一句卻是主動(不過這也很奇怪,by適用在被動居多)
可是他"被"警察看到,然後跑掉
這樣上一句被動 下一句主動沒錯ㄚ

2007-06-06 11:22:22 · update #8

Being seated at the table, he was waiting for her.
= Seated at the table, he was waiting for her.
= When he was seated at the table, he was waiting for her.
他坐在桌子旁 是主動,位啥這裡ㄉ動詞用be+p.p
還是這裡ㄉseated是形容詞

2007-06-06 11:27:38 · update #9

2007-06-06 15:23:35 ㄉ補充問題用錯ㄌ
可以當沒看到^^

2007-06-06 11:31:13 · update #10

Being caught in the rain, he got a cold(被動)
Being seated at the table, he was waiting for her(主動)
being都可省略,這樣被動和主動還有區別ㄇ

2007-06-06 20:07:46 · update #11

快快快~~誰來回答我緊急ㄉ問題
拜託高手在哪~~

2007-06-06 20:17:20 · update #12

to hobo:
這句Formed 4.7 billion years ago, the Earth is the one and only planet for lives.地球於47億年前形成. "形成"這裡不是應該用主動ㄇ

2007-06-07 18:19:14 · update #13

i was wondering if you wanted to go out sometime.
可以寫i am wondering if you want to go out sometime
就是寫成現在式.可以ㄇ

i was wondering if you wanted to go out sometime
是因為有sometime(表過去或未來ㄉ某ㄍ時後)
所以用過去式
可改成i am wondering if you want to go out sometimesㄇ

2007-06-07 19:28:24 · update #14

這裡ㄉwondering 是形容詞還是動名詞
可以寫i wondered if you wanted to go out sometime.ㄇ

hang up a coat on the wall
hang up 沒有掛ㄉ一ㄙㄚ
為什麼不寫hang out a coat on the wall 沒有以下哪ㄍ用法以及分別ㄉ意思

2007-06-07 19:28:47 · update #15

may i leave a message
can i leave a message
can you leave a message

may i take a message
can i take a message
can you take a message

2007-06-07 19:29:53 · update #16

John slept when Cindy came to visit him
John was slepping when Cindy came to visit him
這兩句意思有差ㄇ
John was making ghost souds while his friends slept in their tents
John made ghost souds while his friends slept in their tents
這兩句ㄉ句法有錯ㄇ
各為什麼意思

2007-06-07 19:30:11 · update #17

when he ws seated at the table,he was waiting for her
可以寫
when he was sitting at the table ,he was waiting for her
或when he sat at the table ,he was waiting for her嗎

2007-06-07 19:32:28 · update #18

**********************以上問題不用回答********
最新問題為以下ㄉ問題
to hobo:
這句Formed 4.7 billion years ago, the Earth is the one and only planet for lives.地球於47億年前形成. "形成"這裡不是應該用主動ㄇ

i was wondering if you wanted to go out sometime.
這句是在說改天可不可以跟我出去
sometime 在(將來或過去)某一時候,這裡事指將來
為什麼用過去式在問

2007-06-09 13:59:27 · update #19

7 個解答

1. 這句的that示代替beliefsㄇ
that引導的是形容詞子句
--->是的

2.分辭構句(被動的)

3.同第2題壓(你可以研究看看他們是一樣的sentence structure)

要去看劉伯溫長智慧了,有空再詳答

2007-06-06 00:32:26 補充:
問題2和3式分詞構句
那原來ㄉ句子
2.it is built/it was built by order of the....
3.It is founded in 1870......
是醬ㄇ^^
-->除了應該要用過去式外,和2句個少了連接詞連接"句子"外,你說的對

2007-06-06 00:32:49 補充:
Seated at the table, he was waiting for her.-->這是對的句子

那Being caught in the rain, he got a cold.
這句being是不是不能省,因為這句是被動
---> 可省,就像你說的"在分詞構句中being (having been) 可省略"

As he was seen by the policeman, he ran away.
可以寫As he saw by the policeman, he ran away.嗎
-->不對,上一句是被動,下一句卻是主動(不過這也很奇怪,by適用在被動居多)

2007-06-06 00:33:02 補充:
You should have your hair cut.
可以寫You should have cut your hair嗎
或是 You should have that your hair cut嗎
-->不行,你把主題拉遠了,have是使役動詞,你要搞清楚使役動詞的用法先

2007-06-06 00:39:36 補充:
啥是分辭構句,我先給你結論,他的用法和關代一樣(應該說在英文的用法裡概念都很像,舉凡感官動詞等,主動--> Ving, 被動--> Vpp

分辭構句用法: 在2個經由連接詞連接起來的句子中,把連接辭的句子,省略相同的主詞,和being or having been即成 (不過分辭構句在連接詞部份向來有很大的爭議,這你不需要懂)

2007-06-06 00:39:45 補充:
例: Because he was caught in the rain, he got a cold.
省略連接詞because和相同主詞 he之後變成
Being caught in the rain, he got a cold. 在省略being變成
Caught in the rain, he got a cold.

2007-06-06 00:41:26 補充:
Being seated at the table, he was waiting for her.
= Seated at the table, he was waiting for her.
= When he was seated at the table, he was waiting for her.

2007-06-06 14:31:33 補充:
超人在You should have your hair cut.
可以寫You should have cut your hair嗎
或是 You should have that your hair cut嗎
說的很對喔,我倒是又跳過去了,看錯第2個句子了,第2個句子是在說modal

2007-06-06 14:43:02 補充:
看到超人大大多益功課,我就暈了,超人真有耐心準備,是我一定就是虎頭蛇尾

2007-06-06 17:47:23 補充:
晚上幫你解答你有些觀念不清楚

2007-06-07 00:24:52 補充:
The beliefs that inspired its construction have long since died out,but the Pyramid remains standing
這句的意思是...

--->你這句我本早想提出質疑了,這裡的have long是啥?擬依定是有漏打資料(這裡不符合文法,have及物動詞,即便座助動詞,後面也要接Vpp)

2007-06-07 00:25:09 補充:
這句ㄉ原來句型應該怎麼寫
--> Because it WAS built by order of the Pharaoh Khufu in the 26th century B.C., the largest Pyramid of Giza is the largest Egyptian pyramid .
前面那句原來句型ㄉ動詞應該是現在式(前後詞性要一致)

---> 詞性要一致是沒錯,但你用錯地方,請以邏輯的方向思考,我以最清楚的例子解釋,這點適用於關代,和這個case(這是個(正常人的)邏輯思考,適用於全部情況才是

2007-06-07 00:25:22 補充:
地球於47億年前形成,他是目前宇宙中唯一有生命存在的星球

Formed 4.7 billion years ago, the Earth is the one and only planet for lives.
這裡的formed式Vpp,省略的be V要用過去式
The girl who I met yesterday is my classmate.
---> I met the girl yesterday. 和 She is my classmate.並不衝突,為何需要磁性一致呢?(你不訪多想想)

2007-06-07 00:25:39 補充:
As he was seen by the policeman, he ran away.
-->不對,上一句是被動,下一句卻是主動(不過這也很奇怪,by適用在被動居多)
可是他"被"警察看到,然後跑掉
這樣上一句被動 下一句主動沒錯ㄚ

--->你誤會我的意思了,我不是說這句,這句說的沒錯
我是說這句: 可以寫As he saw by the policeman, he ran away.嗎
--->當然不行

2007-06-07 00:25:51 補充:
他坐在桌子旁 是主動,位啥這裡ㄉ動詞用be+p.p
還是這裡ㄉseated是形容詞
--->這是固定用法,通常當做片語( be seated/seat oneself/take a seat)在背
的喔,是不是形容詞並不重要,老實說我也分不清是不是(有些本來扯也扯不清, I am surprised, surprised是被動還是形容詞?? 這不重要!)

2007-06-07 00:26:02 補充:
你的問題很多,但我有可能時間有限,你有補習嗎?不訪問補習般或學校老師,或同學一起討論,網路上太費時了,又解釋不清,不是初學者建基礎最好的學習管道,當然我有空,會盡量幫你解答

2007-06-07 00:29:12 補充:
Being caught in the rain, he got a cold(被動)
Being seated at the table, he was waiting for her(主動)
being都可省略,這樣被動和主動還有區別ㄇ

--->我說過了,對你來說be seated是主動或是被動對你來說根本不重要,重要的事,你要知道分辭構具的規則即可, be seated或類似 I am surprised是被動還是形容詞根本對你就不重要

2007-06-07 00:41:07 補充:
是主動還是被動非常簡單分,就是主動--> Ving, 被動--> Vpp

2007-06-07 00:42:57 補充:
是我的話,我一定會省略being or having been,要不然看起來像省的不乾不淨一樣(還是有例外不能省的....但我不想說,因為說了對你無益)

2007-06-07 00:43:26 補充:
說這麼多,重點就只有

2007-06-07 00:43:47 補充:
說這麼多,重點就只有主動--> Ving, 被動--> Vpp

2007-06-07 23:33:12 補充:
1. Keven大大您說[long since]=[long ago],我在此受教了,改天有空時要去了解這一部份

2.是屬於[分詞片語],而並非真正的分詞構句, "" 因為前後段之間並不存在明顯的相互關係(而這種關係正是分詞構句所表達的).""

-->Kevin大大的這番話學問很深,就如同我之前所說的,分辭構句連接詞的部份,有各種不同的說法/聲音

2007-06-07 23:36:22 補充:
3. 全句最原始的樣子是:
The largest Pyramid of Giza is the largest Egyptian pyramid, and it was built by order of the Pharaoh Khufu in the 26th century B.C.

-->這部分轉化學問也很大(已經像GMAT的修辭了,....我現在想起來了,這句話增出現再我看過的一本書裡,但我記憶不深...)

4.Kevin 大大接下來的解釋/句型轉化,也是我曾試著要研究的,這部分我自問著墨不深,未曾下過苦功,只能說Kevin大大英文實力深厚,不知你這方面所學是不是和我拜讀過的書是同一本呢

2007-06-08 00:13:09 補充:
2.是屬於[分詞片語],而並非真正的分詞構句, "" 因為前後段之間並不存在明顯的相互關係(而這種關係正是分詞構句所表達的).""

-->Kevin大大的這番話學問很深,就如同我之前所說的,分辭構句連接詞的部份,有各種不同的說法/聲音

--->這種關係,據我所知是"存在","因果"關係(這方面真深奧!),不知和您的認知相不相同

2007-06-08 00:22:07 補充:
(這方面真深奧!)---->我的感覺是這方面只能意會,不能言傳

2007-06-08 19:47:27 補充:
Kevin大大,你的回答很好啊,怎麼刪了,分詞片語,我的認知是常見的generally speaking, judging from...等等,聽您這麼一說,看來我需要找個時間研究研究了,謝謝,我受教了

2007-06-10 17:37:37 補充:
地球於47億年前形成. "形成"這裡不是應該用主動ㄇ
--->這個看個人的認知(有些瓶子時間久了,沒人打破他,還是破了,所以看說話人的認知,這種情形下,有模糊地帶的空間)

2007-06-10 17:43:00 補充:
可以寫i am wondering if you want to go out sometime
就是寫成現在式.可以ㄇ
-->可以,但意境不同
這裡ㄉwondering 是形容詞還是動名詞
-->動名詞

2007-06-10 17:49:13 補充:
sometime 在(將來或過去)某一時候,這裡事指將來
為什麼用過去式在問
---> 將來或"過去"的某個時間
有can you take a message/May I leave a message? ㄉ用法ㄇ 事指打電話ㄉ人叫接電話ㄉ人留言ㄇ
-->一般是這樣沒錯(打電話找人的說),但也不一定 (看對話內容,那是說你可以抄下來我說的嗎?)

2007-06-10 17:52:00 補充:
John was slepping when Cindy was coming to visit him.這句有錯ㄇ
--> When VS While 是個學問,我只能說when+ Ving比較少見(這方面我還沒時間研究看看)
slepping事可持續ㄉ動作 那comeㄋ
-->一般是這樣沒錯,但能不能說是涵蓋所有情況,我不能這樣說(範圍太大了)

2007-06-13 12:12:46 補充:
哇,你的問題好多,你需要把人家告訴你的做一下消化喔,最後一個問題,好像已經回答過了,你想想看為什麼不行改成 Ving,例外,你可以去補習或買本文法書看會比較仔細啊,我時間不多,先這樣

2007-06-17 00:25:42 補充:
and there will be a crazy clown show
-->沒上下文,我只能猜是有一個party要舉辦,而有要選prince and princess,接下來會有小丑秀上演

2007-06-17 00:28:47 補充:
這句為什麼who前面不加逗號
-->這是說話者主觀的意識,他認為聽的人不認識Paul是誰,如果加了,代表大家(事前)都知道Paul 是誰了
I like Michael Jackson, who is an American singer and dancer.

2007-06-17 00:31:43 補充:
以上的解釋對ㄇ (She breakS her leg, 過去完成式不行單獨存在)
--->時態應用層面很複雜,你的解釋基本上可以

2007-06-17 00:34:10 補充:
這句是啥意
-->查字典你就知道了

這句為什麼用過去完成式
-->錯誤用法,過去完成式不行單獨存在,我想另一個時間,聽的人已經知道了,所以會出現那句話)

2007-06-17 00:37:00 補充:
為什麼這裡which前不加逗號
-->原因同意見005,你可以參考文法書

這裡的用had seen過去完成示 ,前面為什麼不用called(過去式)
還是would call ㄉwould 就是過去式
--->完成式(已經)的時間比簡單試早發生,比過去式(would)的時間還早,當然是用過去完成式

2007-06-17 00:39:00 補充:
最後,誠心的建議你買本文法書拜讀,因為文法書會有例句,絕對比網路上問來的好,即便是英文老師,他沒書,也很難舉例給你解釋
例句絕對是非常重要的

2007-06-17 01:20:47 補充:
我回答在意見

2007-06-17 20:32:03 補充:
加油了

2007-06-18 23:37:43 補充:
用She has broken her leg,事現在式,士表示說他腿已經斷了,現在還是斷的,式醬ㄇ
-->是已經"完成"的概念,他腿斷了是事實了,現在還是斷的?--->我不能這麼說
因為句子只說道break legs這件事而已,你只能單就說話的人說的資訊去解讀

I have talked to Mary on the phone. 不能說明現在還在talking to Mary.只能說"已經"做完talking這個動作

2007-06-18 23:39:21 補充:
family members from all across the country would call to say that they had seen us on TV or in the newspaper.
這裡的用had seen過去完成示 ,前面為什麼不用called(過去式)
還是would call ㄉwould 就是過去式
"我要問ㄉ是would callㄉ部分"

請看以下回答

2007-06-18 23:41:56 補充:
Now: Mary says she will go shopping (tomorrow).

明天過後(變過去式了): Mary SAID she WOULD go shopping.

你的問題,就是這樣(原理一樣)

family members from all across the country would call to say that they had seen us on TV or in the newspaper.
--->上面的用法只是在說明"時間"是發生在過去時間

2007-06-18 23:42:37 補充:
如果是發生在現在時間:
Family members from all across the country will call to say taht they have seen us on TV or in the newspaper.

2007-06-20 14:54:13 補充:
嗨,動詞是句子的心臟,所以動詞時態很重要,說真的,時態的生活應用面真的不容易
你的問題我只能說完成式是"已經完成"的用法,至於其他,我不便說,因為我不是生活在英語系國家,很缺乏生活(英語)經驗,就連大師都不一定能正確的應用

2007-06-04 16:16:12 · answer #1 · answered by hobo_惑伯 6 · 0 0

>這家不錯 lv333。cC買幾次啦真的一樣
兛保冄厫哓

2014-08-06 23:22:59 · answer #2 · answered by iegdtuu 1 · 0 0

還是要去 http://aaashops。com 品質不錯,老婆很喜歡!
勱倌

2014-01-05 11:21:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

還是要去 http://aaashops。com 品質不錯,老婆很喜歡!
兇呾卫

2014-01-01 02:04:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

用She has broken her leg,事現在式,士表示說他腿已經斷了,現在還是斷的,式醬ㄇ-->是已經"完成"的概念,他腿斷了是事實了,現在還是斷的?--->我不能這麼說

也就是說在描述事實,用現在式和現在完成式ㄇ

2007-06-19 17:49:01 補充:
suddenly,Tina fell down the stage and she has broken her leg.
suddenly,Tina fell down the stage and she broke her leg.
是不是下面那句才是對的

2007-06-19 13:47:58 · answer #5 · answered by ss 2 · 0 0

To hobo:
"這種關係,據我所知是"存在","因果"關係"

其實我原來就是打算這麼說, 後來覺得或許不只有這樣而已, 故只提出"有關係"的講法. 畢竟不是科班研究者, 謹慎為上.

2007-06-08 09:55:35 補充:
這種關係要簡單講, 就是超人大大所說的:
分詞構句基本上就是行使"副詞功能".
而分詞片語則為"形容詞"的角色.

2007-06-08 05:51:31 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin 7 · 0 0

我也來補充補充。

1.分詞構句,〈與其說分詞構句我會說分詞片語〉:
分詞構句是由副詞子句縮減而成的,目的是為了修飾動詞
原始結構為:Conj+S+V, S+V+O.
改為分詞構具的步驟如下:
a. 取消連接詞(Conj)
b. 取消主詞(S)
c. 動詞若主動改為現在分詞;被動改為過去分詞

舉例:
As he was seen by the policeman, he ran away.
改為分詞構句就是:(Being) seen by the policeman, he ran away.
Being 省略目的是簡潔(conciseness);此外,因為是被看到(was seen by)所以動詞要改為過去分詞

再一個例子:這次一步一步來
原句:While I was walking along, I met Mary.
分構:
a. 消Conj:I was walking along, I met Mary.
b. 消S:Was walking along, I met Mary.
c. 主動改現在分詞;被動改過去分詞:Walking along, I met Mary.(這裡是主動,所以用walking)

至於你有提到分詞構句可不可以用
It is built/it was built by order of the....
It is founded in 1870......
來寫,答案是不可以,因為犯了一個嚴重的文法錯誤,就是流水句(Run-on sentence)。
流水具的結構是:S+V+O, S+V+O. 一個句子不可以只靠一個逗點就連接兩個主要子句。

It(依照句意指FAO Schwarz) is founded in 1870 by FrederickAugust Otto Schwarz,FAO Schwarz has delighted children for more than a century.
這個句子有兩個主要子句,千萬不可以這樣寫。

He seated at the table,he was waiting for her. 這也是Run-on Sentence,是錯的,不可以這樣寫。

2.You should have your hair cut.跟You should have cut your hair.句意不同:
You should have your hair cut.指對方告訴你應該剪頭髮;You should have cut your hair.表你應該剪頭髮,但你沒有。

至於You should have that your hair cut,這句文法錯,have要接過去分詞才對不可以接關係代名詞。

2007-06-06 08:28:18 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers