English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
所有分類

我有篇英文作文

想請大家幫我改

希望能有人幫我看一下

I think each person ── no matter he occupies in any type political
system ── all to have two faces. One is they walks in the street, in the
office, the movie theater, the public vehicle or the passenger vehicle
appearance. In the West, this face is a vigor abundant, represents
successful or the success in namely a face. That face suits in the outside
world wears, wears looked to the stranger. I thought “good faith” is
one kind of extremely complex combination. We never can say
extremely assuredly that, “I very good faith' or 'I not good faith”.
Our all achievement with has faced the condition, all was we does not
have other outlet result. Even if has other choice, that also must quite
good choice, but only is and the original that choice compared to appears one. Trades a way to say, is two evils takes its light choice. Certainly, this is the so-called good faith definition. We all think 100% dishonesty, but we cannot accomplish. Every day you must make all kinds of decision, forever is unable 100% good faith.

2007-05-14 19:32:39 · 2 個解答 · 發問者 阿水 1 in 社會與文化 語言

2 個解答

I think everyone ─ no matter what political systems he faces ── will be featured be two faces. One is the face they wear in streets, in the office, the movie theater, the public transportation vehicle. In the West, this face is a vigorous facade representing upcoming success just around the corner. It means a face suitable for external world seen by by mundane people and strangers. I thought "good faith" is a kind of extremely complex combination. We can never assure that, "I am highly faithful' or 'I am not faithful." All our achievement and the past experience we faced would be the total outcome under the ultimate situations of no way out. Even if there's another choice available, it never means the most favorable choice but only a choice better than the original one. To put it differently, we just make expedient choices. Certainly, it is exactly the definition for faith to my mind. We are eager for 100% faithfulness but we cannot accomplish it actually. Every day you must make all kinds of decisions but no 100% good faith can be achieved. .
有時候沒空會拖上3-5日才能夠回答 也請見諒 因為忙事情去了
Http://www.yushan.idv.tw
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/twntnacys

2007-05-16 06:31:33 · answer #1 · answered by twntnacys 7 · 0 0

我認為各個人?? 他佔領在任一型政治系統? 的沒有問題? 所有有二張面孔。你是他們走在街道, 在辦公室, 電影院、公開車或載客車輛出現。在西方, 這張面孔是強健豐富, 代表成功或成功在即面孔。面孔衣服在外部世界佩帶,
佩帶看對陌生人。我認為"良好信譽誠意" 是一种極端複雜組合。我們能極端確定地從未說那, "我非常良好信譽誠意' 或' 我不是良好信譽誠意" 。我們的所有成就與面對了情況, 全部是我們沒有其它出口結果。既使有其它選擇, 那並且必須相當好選擇, 但只是並且選擇比較的原物出現一個。換方式說, 是二罪惡作為它輕挑選。一定, 這是所謂的良好信譽誠意定義。我們全部認為100% 不誠實, 但我們無法完成。每天您必須做出各種各樣決定, 永遠是無法100% 良好信譽誠意。
----------------------------------
你覺得有錯嘛?

2007-05-14 20:01:28 · answer #2 · answered by Man_ing 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers