若中國共產黨對台灣再用文攻武嚇的方法，請問有沒有其他方法所取代？

Question

若對台灣再用文攻武嚇，又心思想牽制日本的軍事擴張，本人不認同仿傚忽必烈承勢攻打日本的方法；何況古代名君康熙需有參考忽必烈的曾經派遣軍隊進攻東征日本的失敗教訓，也不會承勢東征日本，原因是當年兩位名君做法不同，請問有甚麼不同？若中國共產黨能夠掌兩位名君的成敗關鍵，相信他們是有能力攻打台灣牽制日本，請問利弊何在？

If Taiwan use against us, thought to contain Japan's military expansion. I do not agree to follow the situation of Kublai for attacking Japan;

２）Moreover, the need for reference Kang Jun Ancient Kublai Khan sent the army to attack the failure of the Inquisition Japanese lessons Inquisition not for the situation in Japan, the reasons were two-year practice, is there any difference?

３）If the Chinese Communist Party can hold two people - the key to success, I believe they have the ability to attack Taiwan to contain Japan. Will the pros?

Answer 1

中國共產黨只是紙老虎，靠嚇台灣幾十年，但在有美國存在的一天，也不敢真正攻打台灣！


時代不同了，現代的中國人只想發財，不想辛苦打戰了！