17歲表弟俾人告詐騙喎....

Question

我表弟一向有在YAHOO拍賣，評分一直很好，
直至上年，因為電腦中左病毒，拎左幾次去整，結果仲要刪機，仲連電郵的E-MAIL都刪左一大半。
過左一段時間先開番電郵，嘗試去搵番佢地，有幾個買家因為表弟未寄貨俾佢，(我表哥係大陸訂貨，但當時剛巧廠商缺貨)又冇回覆，走左去報案，因為同時有幾位買家一起報案，當時我表哥係唔知道，就俾左警察叫上去警局問話，去到又呃我表弟話乖乖認左佢就可以走得~~~唔會有案底(我表弟得17歲咋)，一定冇事~於是我表弟信佢地班人咁講~~就俾佢地亂錄口供，後黎警察個邊話要告我表哥詐騙，請問有咩方法解決，希望有人能給些意見。

Answer 1

17歲的表弟就唔會有事

佢是一個
minors
Minors are people under the age of 18. When contracts are entered into by minors, thay are generally voidable at the potion of the minor. This makes the contract non-binding on the minor but binding on the other party.

不過，minors所簽的合約是學術/生活必需品就有效

咁你話yahoo 拍賣，就非學術/生活必需品
所以是一個voidable contract

但是佢話告你表哥(咁佢應該大過18歲)
就要ge la

不實之陳述 (Misrepresentation) (A) 欺詐性的不實陳述 (Fraudulent Misrepresentation)
1. 意義：一方明知不實，而仍作出的陳述。
2. 受害方証明對方不誠實的意圖。
3. 受害方因誤信對方不實的陳述，被引誘與對方締約時 ，受害方於知道受騙時，有權撤銷契約，並要求賠償。
Once it has become clear that a misstatement has been made it made it may turn out to be fraudulent. The three tenets of fraudulent misrepresentation were laid out in Derry V Peek (1889) 14App Cas 337. They are that statement was made either with the knowledge that itws false, or without belief in its truth, or recklessly without care as to its truth or not.

(B) 過失的不實陳述 (Negligent Misrepresentation)
　1. 意義：一方沒有合理的理由去相信是事實，仍作出的不實陳述。
2. 被告須證明，他有合理的理由，相信所作出的陳述是事實。
3. 受害方有權撤銷契約，並要求賠償。
Hedlsy Byrne v Heller (1964) AC465
A banker's reference was given to the plaintiffs, and relying on this reference they lent money to the compant who was the subject of the reference. The reference was negligently given and the compant defaulted on the loan. The defendant bank tried to rely on a disclaimer clause to avoid liability. The court however felt that there was a special relationship and the judgement led to the creation of the concept of negligent misstatement.

(C) 無意的不實陳述 (Innocent Misrepresentation)
1. 意義：一方並無故意，亦無過失，而作出的不實陳述。
2. 受害方只有權撤銷契約，不可要求賠償。

Bissett V Willkinson (1927)
A vendor sold two blocks of land called "Homestead" and " Hogan's" to purchasers for the purpose of sheep farming. The purchasers failed in their business and declined to pay the balance of the purchase moneys according to their agreement. When the vendor brought this action for the sum owed, the purchasers alleged by the way of defence and counter-claim that the vendor had "represented and warreanted that the land which was subject of the agreement had a carrying capacity of 2000 sheep if only one team were employed in the agricultural work of the said land". The meaning of the representation as alleged was that the capacity of the land during winter, with such food as could be grown by the proper use in ploughing of one team of horses regularly employed throughout the year, was 2000 sheep. Held : the vendor's statement made prior to the sale was nothing more than an expression of opinion honestly held, and the fact that it was mistaken did not entite the purchasers to rescission.

你講那一個是什麼不實陳述?
第一種/二種就有事

可能要找法律支援
法律援助署熱線 (電話 : 2537 7677，傳真 2537 5948，電郵 : [e-mail])

希望幫到你

Answer 2

你表弟明知有人同佢買咗嘢,就算自己部電腦有事,都可以在外面用電腦(好似圖書館 朋友 學校 地鐵 網吧等地方的電腦 ),做好有關的交帶事件給人一個交代吧,而且修理電腦怎會連電郵都刪了,比如我的yahoo電郵,都需要登入電郵id及密碼才開到,yahoo電郵不是在自己個電腦內的,是在yahoo內,任何一部電腦都開到...而你表弟這件事向父母表態,叫父母去攪大佢,走去向有法律資詢的議員求助,兼向警察投訴料

Answer 3

那麼，你表弟係咪收了那些人錢，但是無交貨呀﹖你表弟有無同差人解釋件事﹖17歲都應該知道詐騙係好嚴重的指控，無就應該一定唔認。依家你應該叫他盡快找法律意見，將當日係差館落口供的情形，以及成件事的經過，講俾律師知。他們了解事情之後，一定會盡力幫你表弟的。你表弟上了庭未﹖其實，如果案件在裁判司處處理，他們有當值律師服務，收費相宜，一樣professional。你可以請他連絡當值律師服務。或者，你叫他請私人律師都得。