可否追討賠償?

Question

鑽石戒指,用4隻抓既方法鑲嵌,有一日出街食完飯之後發現鑽石跌左,但隻戒指托仲係套住係自己手指上.4隻抓其中有一隻,頭頂果粒 "的"唔見左,因為咁所以抓唔住粒石跌左!
但抓脚部份非常完整,肉眼見唔到彎曲或撞花既痕跡.
同珠寶商交涉過,及比佢既職員睇埋,佢地答覆係我自己撞甩左粒石,唔關佢地事.
我唔同意佢地既講法,我冇撞過粒石,我覺得係佢地鑲嵌得唔好,或者戒指托既質地唔好,由乜理由可以只係撞跌粒石,但其他地方完好?
宜家公說公有理,我唔想同佢地討論,但我乜都唔識又未遇過呢d咁既事,請問我應該做d乜野,證明隻戒指鑲嵌or質地有問題,令到我有損失,宜家我要追討賠償?
我應該直接搵消費者委員會投訴嗎,搵消委會之前我要做d乜?搵公正行有用嗎?還是我應該去甚麼地方去追討?
請各位有心人事解答,我為了此事已經筋疲力盡,謝謝!

隻介指係我老公買比我既,有曬單據證書,而且我係做文職,打下字file下野咁,我又冇粗重野要做!!珠寶商話我自己撞跌左隻抓脚頭頂粒 "的",我真係冇撞過呀,就算係,我點撞先可以撞到只係粒"的"唔見左,但隻抓脚仲可以完整係度咁高技術喎!!而且需要幾大力度先可以撞得甩呢粒 "的"?我真係百思不得其解!!

Answer 1

先要清楚
sales of good 的條例先
s.14
title (你有冇權sales出去)

s.15
description(描述)
即，老闆，如果叫你講返d貨
同實物唔同

s.16(3)
fitness
for 個人目的

s.16(2)
merchantable quality
可銷售質素

s.17
sales by sample

如果 Breach(違約是以上原因)
咁你就可以
Reject the goods
accept goods, claim damages
partial acceptance(reject the other )

如果你咁講
爭議就是s16(2)

merchantable quality
Section 16(2) provides that ' Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied condition that the goods supplied under the contract are of merchantable quality, except that there is no such condition :
a. as regards defects specifically drawn to the buyer's attention before the contract is made: or
b. if the buyer examines the goods before the contract is made, as regards defects which that examination ought to reveal'

Good are of merchantable quality within the meaning of SOGO if they are-
a. as fit for the purpose or purposes for which goods of that kind are commonly bought;
b. of such standard of appearance and finish;
c. as free from defects (including minor defects);
d. as safe: and
e. As durable

Conditions tend to be vital terms of he contract which go to the root of the contract.
Coniditions impose obligations into the contract which, if breached, entitle the injured party to claim a total failure of the contract and to repudiate that contract.

A warranty is a less vital term of a contract which is merely collateral to the main rerms.

咁你這個case
就可能是
b. of such standard of appearance and finish;
c. as free from defects (including minor defects);

因為佢做得唔好

仲有，你是冇啦啦頭頂果粒 "的"唔見左
一般人的使用用途?
你用咗來做咩?

平常人咁用，咁就以claim 賠償


2007-02-15 15:49:29 補充：
我應該直接搵消費者委員會投訴嗎,搵消委會之前我要做d乜?搵公正行有用嗎?還是我應該去甚麼地方去追討?可以搵消費者委員會不過，你話法律理論聽，佢受，就得啦因為好煩如果要case支持，都有

2007-02-15 15:51:47 補充：
In Rogers v Parish (Scarbourough ) Ltd (1987) 2 AAL ER 232, it was held that the plaintif was entitled to his money back when a new car he had bought had a number of faults. The garage had attempted to put right the faults but after six months the plaintiff rejected the car.

Answer 2

good

Answer 3

好難追討,珠寶公司會搬好多理由反駁你,如果你找公正行,要看你的戒指值多少錢,因公正行收費不少的.
至於搵消費者委員會投訴,以我經驗是沒用的,程序是,打電話投訴,委員會方面會叫你將單據投訴理由,賠償多少.寄或傳真給消委會.
消委會將你的要求轉達給珠寶公司,如珠寶公司拒絕賠償,消委會人員會寄信給你,說珠寶公司拒絕賠償,你可入稟小額錢債法庭告珠寶公司(消委會連同告他的章程一同寄上)但是告上法庭後,若你輸了,珠寶公司有權要求你賠償他要上法庭時間上的損失
自己經驗是做一大輪,到後都是得到一肚氣