Chlorine bleach can be reduced by dilute HCI to form CI2
Why this statement is wrong?
OCI- + CI- + 2H+ --> CI2 + H2O
oxidation no. of CI in CI = +1
oxidation no. of CI in CI2 = 0
Why this is wrong?
by the way, chlorine bleach can be said as oxidizing agent?
2007-02-14 16:09:55 · 1 個解答 · 發問者 2003 2 in 科學 ➔ 化學
Because oxidation and reducation can only be referred to ATOMS when you are referring to the definition of oxidation/reduction as involving a change in oxidation number.
So, you can say that chlorine atom in OCI− is reduced because its oxidation number is reduced from +1 to -1, but you cannot say that chlorine bleach is reduced.
Also, in the equation: OCI− + CI− + 2H+ --> CI2 + H2O
Cl has an oxidation no. of +1 in OCI−, but its oxidation number in CI− is -1. So when you are referring to chlorine in general, it is both reduced AND oxidized at the same time, i.e. a disproportionation reaction.
Besides, chlorine bleach (OCI− ) only contributes 1 Cl atom to the reaction. The other Cl atom comes from HCl. So saying that OCI− is reduced to form Cl2 is not correct. You can only say that they REACT to form Cl2.
2007-02-14 22:11:41 補充:
By the way, Chlorine bleach is an oxidizing agent.
2007-02-14 22:12:53 補充:
Amendment. The second paragraph, oxidation number is reduced from 1 to 0.
2007-02-14 17:10:50 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋