Are Not 同 Do not 係返學上既句子解釋有咩分別？

Question

We are not go to school tomorrow.

We do not go to school tomorrow.

我驚我寫錯～所以講晒出黎....
１句話聽日唔洗返學～
１句話已經冇再返學讀書～

請問呢２句應該點分呢？

如果我文法錯....可唔可以教我點改？

Answer 1

動詞方面有兩種：連綴動詞及動作動詞。動作動詞表示主詞「在做甚麼」。連綴動詞表示主詞「是甚麼」。be 就是最常用的連綴動詞，而 be 因為主詞的第幾身作出變化如 am，is，are。然後又因為時間性再變身如 was，were。

動作動詞在構問句或否定句時，必須要 do 作輔助動詞。
當 do 作為主要動詞，意：做，那 do 就是動作動詞。而問句或否定句裡會多了一個 do 作輔助動詞。
e.g. I do my homework. / Do I do my homework? / I do not do my homework.
你的例句中，主要動詞是 go ，一個動作動詞。所以做否定句時要有 do 輔助： We do not go to school tomorrow.

輔助動詞種類：
1. be 在主要動詞前，而主要動詞加-ing，那就是作進行式。
2. be 在主要動詞前，而主要動詞變作過去分詞時，那就是輔助形成被動語態
3. will 在主要動詞前作未來式(如上)。
4. have 在主要動詞前作完成式，而主要動詞變作過去分詞時，那就是作完成式。
5. do 可輔助主要動作動詞構成否定句或問句。

所以你的另一句要用到 'are' 時，它必是 1. 作進行式。那 go 必要加 -ing 了： We are not going to school tomorrow. 意：我們明天(將)不會上學。表示計劃好的行動。

還有一種叫情態動詞：
must, can, may ... 表示主要動詞的情態。
要做到「聽日唔洗返學～」的意思便要運用到情態動詞 "have to" / "need to" (即需要之意)了：
We do not have to go to school tomorrow.
We do not need to go to school tomorrow. / We need not go to school tomorrow.
(小心多了情態動詞時，構否定句都各有不同作法。)

致於「已經冇再返學讀書～」，因為「已經」與「tomorrow」的意思有沖突，不能一起用： We haven't been going to school. (現在完成進行式) present perfect continuous 表示動作還在進行中、還持續著。

Answer 2

１句話聽日唔洗返學～
We don't need to go to school tomorrow.

１句話已經冇再返學讀書～
We aren't study in the school anymore.

Answer 3

We are not go (going) to school tomorrow.
應說成 - We have no school tomorrow. 我們明天不用返學.
很奇怪, 香港不常用 no school 這詞句.

We do not go to school tomorrow. 我們明天不返學.

話已經冇再返學讀書～
We quit studying tomorrow (or from tomorrow) = 我們明天開始不再返學.

Answer 4

其實照第一句o既意思,應該譯成: We don't need to go to school tomorrow.
但是你一定要類似的話: We are not going to school tomorrow.( be+verb+ing = 將來,habit)

照第二句o既意思,應該譯成: We do not go to school now. (not anymore, because 你將來可能會再讀書)

Answer 5

應該係We" will "not go to school tomorrow
因為係'tomorrow',future tense:>
所以兩句都吾岩既,
而吾洗返學既英文係:we won't go to school tomoroow.
已經冇再返學讀書既英文係:we do not go to school anymore.