Peter is going to be left at his friend\'s house.
請問這句要怎翻才順呢? be left，是被動嗎?
請幫忙，謝謝...
2006-03-14 05:34:50 · 5 個解答 · 發問者 威廉 4 in 社會與文化 ➔ 語言
聽了 Michael 的說法後，我終於了解，為何朋友(老外)說，Peter 留在他朋友家。他舉例子...
Peter is going to leave at his friend's house. -- Peter 將離開
另一句，就是我問的，被留下
但是....這是文法問題嗎? 還是片語啊(我查不到此片語)
實在搞不懂...
2006-03-14 05:59:04 · update #1
be going to=will
be left是被動式沒錯~意為被留下,被遺棄,被委託給...
Peter will be left at his friend's house.
Peter將被留在他朋友家
這可能是peter的爸媽把他留在那或是他朋友要他留下來
不是他要將要離開他朋友家
因為如果是他要離開他朋友家
應該說Peter is going to leave his friend's house.
有錯請指證
2006-03-13 14:01:28 · answer #1 · answered by 立志成為英文大師 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
left behind.....?
2006-03-14 05:35:51 · answer #2 · answered by D L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
上面說的都對～只有ＫＡＹ的是錯的！！！
be left是被留下的意思～並不是離開！
你的題目是對的喔～
Peter is going to be left at his friend's house.
Peter 將會被留在他的朋友家．
2006-03-14 19:41:42 補充：
No offense to Kay....I didn't mean to correct you..I just don't want the person who asked to get the wrong answer~
2006-03-13 22:40:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peter is going to be left at his friend's house.
be left，沒錯，是被動用法。left是leave的過去分詞，在此並非離開之意，而是「留下」。
所以翻譯成：「彼得將被留在他的朋友家。」
2006-03-13 13:50:42 · answer #4 · answered by Michael 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
比特將要離開他朋友的房子.
be going to 等於 will
就是'將要'
2006-03-14 22:53:37 補充：
我錯了,對不起大家...............太急著回答案的結果,真糗~~
2006-03-13 13:38:30 · answer #5 · answered by KAY 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋