there was a specific child who was dying,but he still had to undergo transfusion,there comes a point where the chemotherapy has stopped working,but what happens is because the malignancy is growing out of control you have to top them up with blood transfusion and that actually keeps them going,so it extends their life,but the child he had had two previous transfusion and he was coming in for a third and he could have gone on like this for another three.forth months,coming in every weekand having a top up ,he would have then gone home and sat around and done whatever he wanted to do .but he would have been fairly limited because he would still have been required to keep coming back,and the thing that he found really traumatic was having the needle inderted for hid tranfusion .and he did not want them any more .he never like having blood transfusion and he never like the needles that were associated with them .
2006-02-12 21:22:17 · 4 個解答 · 發問者 嘎 1 in 社會與文化 ➔ 語言
There是一個垂危的特別孩子,但是他仍然有接受輸血,There沒有持續接受化學療法,但他持續接受輸血,藉此避免惡性腫瘤持續增長且失去控制,因此他也得以延續生命,但這孩子之前已經輸血過兩次,將要進行第三次的輸血。四個月裡,這樣輸血的動作都在週末完成,There會回家然後無所事事和因為無論他要做什麼都會被限制,這樣的限制是為了讓他恢復以前的生活。 也因為這樣的限制讓他在無聊中發現因為輸血而暗藏在身上的累累傷痕,他非常不想要有這些傷痕,就樣他不喜歡輸血一樣,他也不曾喜歡身上相繫的針頭。我猜是這樣吧,有一些錯字,我把There假設是人。
2006-02-12 22:50:59 · answer #1 · answered by Peggy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
這有類似的
▶▶http://qoozoo20140926.pixnet.net/
2014-11-05 11:30:59 · answer #2 · answered by AWVQZRJPRVLU 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
謝謝你ㄇ
2006-02-13 13:16:52 補充:
請問沛會翻另外一篇ㄉㄇ他們是相關的如果可以麻煩一下.....謝謝很大唷
2006-02-13 08:15:55 · answer #3 · answered by 嘎 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
有死亡的一個特定的孩子,但是他仍然必須歷經輸血,在那裡來化學療法已經停止工作的點,但是什麼發生是,因為惡意正在增加失去控制,你必須向上以輸血超越他們,而且那實際上讓他們進行著,因此,它延伸他們的生活,但是孩子他有有二個先前的輸血和他正在進來為三分之一和他可能像這一樣另一個 three.forth 數個月繼續,來臨在每 weekand 有中
2006-02-13 06:50:01 · answer #4 · answered by Ashley 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋