關於WTO報告.麻煩幫我翻譯(英翻中),最好是自己翻譯的.謝

Question

1. The WTO is NOT for free trade at any cost
It’s really a question of what countries are willing to bargain with each other, of give and take, request and offer.
Yes, one of the principles of the WTO system is for countries to lower their trade barriers and to allow trade to flow more freely. After all, countries benefit from the increased trade that results from lower trade barriers.
But just how low those barriers should go is something member countries bargain with each other. Their negotiating positions depend on how ready they feel they are to lower the barriers, and on what they want to obtain from other members in return. One country’s commitments become another country’s rights, and vice versa.
The WTO’s role is to provide the forum for negotiating liberalization. It also provides the rules for how liberalization can take place.
The rules written into the agreements allow barriers to be lowered gradually so that domestic producers can adjust.
They have special provisions that take into account the situations that developing countries face. They also spell out when and how governments can protect their domestic producers, for example from imports that are considered to have unfairly low prices because of subsidies or “dumping”. Here, the objective is fair trade.
Just as important as freer trade — perhaps more important — are other principles of the WTO system. For example: non-discrimination, and making sure the conditions for trade are stable, predictable and transparent.

Answer 1

1. WTO 不是為自由貿易在這真正地是什麼國家的問題的任何費用是願意講價互相, 公平交易、請求和提議。是, WTO 系統的當中一個原則是使國家降低他們的貿易壁壘和允許貿易更加自由地流動。終究, 國家從增加的貿易有益於那結果從更低的貿易壁壘。但多麼低那些障礙應該是是某事成員國講價互相。他們談判的位置依靠關於怎樣準備好他們感覺他們將降低障礙, 並且什麼他們想要獲得從其它成員在回歸。一個國家的承諾成為其它國家的權利, 和反之亦然。WTO 的角色是為談判的自由化提供論壇。它為怎樣並且提供規則自由化可能發生。規則被寫入協議允許障礙逐漸被降下以便國內生產商能調整。他們有考慮到情況發展中國家面對的特別供應。他們並且明白解說何時並且怎樣政府可能保護他們的國內生產商, 例如從被認為有不合理地低價由於補貼或"傾銷" 的進口。這裡, 宗旨是公正的貿易。正重要像自由貿易- 或許更加重要- 其它WTO 系統的原則。例如: 非歧視性, 和確定條件為貿易穩定, 可預測和透明。

Answer 2

這麼長，翻了也是白翻，因為鐵定被移除。