Then there is antitrust. In times past, people would pay more attention to legal issues, sounding our regulators in advance. There days firms jump into bed within weeks of meeting, and regulatory concerns come later. The Pentagon's objections shocked Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, and scuppered their planned merger, MCI and WorldCom, two American telephone companies, were also surprised by objections to their $37 billion marriage from European regulators. The trust-busters may yet nobble Exxon and Mobil: last week BP and Amoco had to shed 134 petrol stations in return for approval.
A soft trap (這是第二段標題)
Most difficult are the "soft" issues. Another reason Wells Fargo and Union Pacific ran into problems was that they sacked too many of the wrong people Sony's and Matsushita's hardware-software dreams may have been mad from the start; but the Japanese also had nothing in common with the Hollywood smoothies they hired. Look behind any disastrous deal-AT&T's acquisition of NCR (bought for $7 billion in 1991; spun off in 1995 for $3 billion); or Quaker Oats's takeover of Snapple (bought for $1.7 billion in 1994; sold for $300m in 1997) -and the same word keeps popping up: culture.
※ 需要翻的最正確的喔!!!! (翻譯網站翻的有點怪怪的= =) ※
(( 另需兩段大綱@@" 謝謝~ ))
2005-05-19 10:20:27 · 4 個解答 · 發問者 Anonymous in 社會與文化 ➔ 語言
然後是反壟斷,在過去人們比較專注於法律的制定,規定要預先通知管理會,在這個年頭,這些公司只討論了幾個星期就一起上床去了(合併了),管理會永遠是最後一個知道才來關心的.
Lockheed Martin與Northrop Grumman,因五角大廈的反對而嚇得停止了他們計畫中的合併. 兩家美國的大電話公司MCI與WorldCom的370億元合併計畫也被歐洲的管理會提出異議.壟斷殺手總有一天也會對Exxon與Mobil開刀讓他們無法合併,上星期BP與Amoco必須關掉它們134個加油站來換取合併案的核准.
公司文化(Soft軟體方面)的陷阱
大部分的困難發生在"公司文化"這個問題上,Wells Fargo 與 Union Pacific 發生營運困難的另一個理由是他們收容了太多不適用的人員. Sony與Matsushita "軟硬一體"的美夢也許在一開始就是個瘋狂的想法,日本人也與他們所雇用的好萊屋上流社會人士格格不入. 看看過去任何的老交易的背後 - AT&T買下了NCR(在1991年花了70億買入,可是在1995年以30億元甩掉),桂格麥片接手Snapple(1994年以17億買入,1997年以3億元賣掉),在這幾個例子中,相同的字眼不斷的跳出來,那就是 -- "文化"(公司文化的差異).
2005-05-19 14:24:24 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
然后反壟斷在那兒。 在過去的時代裡,人們將更多注意法律問題,提前試探我們的管理者。 那裡天公司在會議的數周內跳進床,並且規章的關心晚來。 五角大樓的異議使洛克希德‧馬丁和諾思羅普Grumman震驚, 並且打敗他們計劃的合並,MCI和世界電信, 兩家美國電話公司,從歐洲管理者對他們的370億美元的結婚因為異議也驚訝。 信任破壞者nobble有埃克森和美孚石油公司︰ 上周BP和阿莫科必須作為對贊成的報答去掉134個加油站。
一非常難的柔軟陷阱是"柔軟"的期刊。 另一個原因富國銀行 聯合太平洋跑進問題是他們開除太的大多數錯誤人新力和松下硬體軟體夢可能從開頭起發狂; 但是日本人也和他們僱佣的好萊塢舉止高雅的人一樣沒有什麼。 在任何災難性的deal-AT&T的獲得NCR后面看(在1991年為70億美元買; 在30億美元1995個分出); 或者Quaker接管燕麥Snapple的(適合到1994年17億美元買; 售價1997中300百萬美元) -並且相同的話一直突然跳出︰ 文化。
2005-05-20 14:33:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
然後有反壟斷的。在時期之內通過, 人們會給予更多注意對法律問題, 事先聽起來我們的管理者。幾天企業那裡跳躍入床在幾星期會議之內, 並且管理關心以後來。五角大樓的反對震驚洛克希德馬丁公司和Northrop Grumman, 和scuppered 他們的計劃的合併, MCI 並且WorldCom, 二家美國電話公司, 由對他們的$37 十億婚姻的反對並且驚奇了從歐洲管理者。反托辣斯官員也許nobble Exxon 和Mobil: 上星期BP 和Amoco 必須流洒134 個加油站以換取認同。 一個軟的陷井最困難是"軟的" 問題。其它原因Wells Fargo 和聯合太平洋運行了入問題是, 他們sacked 太多錯誤人民索尼的並且Matsushita 的硬體軟體夢想也許是瘋狂的從一開始; 但日本人並且食用了□什麼與相同他們聘用的好萊塢圓滑的人。看在NCR 的任一個慘敗成交At&t 的承購之後在1991 年(被買為$7 十億; 1995 年轉動為$3 十億); 或Quaker Snapple 燕麥的接管在1994 年(被買為$1.7 十億; 賣為$300m 在1997) - 並且同樣詞繼續突然出現: 文化。
2005-05-19 21:27:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1.Then, There may trust. In time past, The people pay attention to the legitimate question, Probes us ahead of time the adjuster. That 裡數 date company jumps
in the conference several weeks to the bed in, And the multi- adjusters' relations (matter of the care) later will
come. Pentagon's objection vibrated the Lockheed swallow and their
plan merge, Megacurie and WorldCom by causes Northrop Grumman to their $37 ten
hundred million marriages objections, With scuppered, Two Americas telephone company telco, Was also surprised from European adjuster there. This trust - busters
also may buy Exxon and Mobil: Last week the Baghdad treaty and Amoco had to flow out 134 gas
stations as the authorized repayment
2. The soft snare most is difficult is "the soft" question. Another
reason is good is to question in Fargo and association's Pacific Ocean
transport business they the Sony's wrong person and the Matsushita's
hardware software dream (thought) perhaps the bag too many from starts
is crazy; But also the usual center does not have the thing to accept the
Japanese language with them which the employment Hollywood smoothies
has. Was apportioning - the Atlantic time &T's national cash cash
register (is $7 ten hundred million buys in 1991; Back 1995 was $3 ten hundred million left has spun) any disaster
obtains looked; Or vibration Oats's Snapple (was $1.7 ten hundred million buys in
1994; In 1,997) - and the same word year is $300m has sold takes over
control the maintenance vibration: Culture.
2005-05-19 11:19:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋