Land is regarded as a permanent asset, but improvements upon or to the land have a finite life. Because of the immobility of land, each real estate parcel possesses a unique location. Land’s permanence also means that it will normally be expected to outlast uses and improvements, which have a finite life.
The unique characteristics of land determine its optimal utility. When improved land is valued separately from improvements to or upon the land, economic principles require that improvements to or on the land be valued as they contribute to or detract from the total value of the property. Thus, the Market Value of land based upon the “highest and best use” concept reflects the utility and the permanence of land in the context of a market, with improvements constituting the difference between land value alone and total Market Value as improved.
Most properties are valued as a combination of land and improvements. In such cases, the Valuer will normally estimate Market Value by considering the highest and best use of the property as improved. Highest and best use is defined as:
The most probable use of a property which is physically possible, appropriately justified, legally permissible, financially feasible, and which results in the highest value of the property being valued.
A use that is not legally permissible or physically possible cannot be considered a highest and best use. A use that is both legally permissible and physically possible may nevertheless require an explanation by the Valuer justifying why that use is reasonably probable. Once analysis establishes that one or more uses are reasonably probable uses, they are then tested for financial feasibility. The use that results in the highest value, in keeping with the other tests, is the highest and best use.
Application of this definition permits Valuers to assess the effects of deterioration and obsolescence in buildings, the most appropriate improvements for land, the feasibility of rehabilitation and renovation projects, and many other valuation situations.
In markets characterized by extreme volatility or severe disequilibrium between supply and demand, the highest and best use of a property may be a holding for future use. In other situations, where several types of potential highest and best use are identifiable, the Valuer should discuss such alternative uses and anticipated future income and expense levels. Where land use and zoning are in a state of change, the immediate highest and best use of a property may be an interim use.
The concept of highest and best use is a fundamental and integral part of Market Value estimates.
2005-05-12 05:12:42 · 4 個解答 · 發問者 Anonymous in 社會與文化 ➔ 語言
土地被視為一個永久的資產, 但是進步在或之上到土地有有限的生活。 因為土地的不動性, 每個不動產包裹持有一個獨特的地點。
土地的永久 也意謂它通常將被期望較使用和進步經久, 那一個有有限的生活。 土地的獨特特性決定它的最佳實效。
當改良 土地從進步到或土地之上分開的被評價,經濟的原則 需要進步到或者當他們成為或者的因素減去,在土地上被評價 從財產的總價值。
因此,土地的市場價格基於那 ”最高的和最好使用”觀念反映實效和土地的永久 在市場的上下文中,藉由進步構成不同在 獨自地登陸價值和如改良的總數市場價值。
大多數的財產被評價如一個土地和進步的組合。 在如此的情況 ,評價者將通常藉由考慮最高的和最好估計市場價格 依照改良的財產使用。
最高的和最好的使用被定義當做: 身體上可能,適當地証明的財產最可能使用, 合法可允許﹐財務上能實行,和那一個造成最高價值 被評價的財產。
不是合法可允許或者身體上可能的一種使用不能夠被考慮一 最高的和最好使用。 兩者都合法可允許和身體上可能的一種使用 可能然而需要評價者証明的一種解釋那一種使用是為什麼 適度可能。
一旦分析建立一或者更多的使用適度地有希望的候選人使用,他們然後被為財政的可行性測試。 造成最高的價值使用,在以其他測試保存方面,是最高的和最好使用。
這一種定義的申請允許評價者估計惡化的效果 而且在建築物中的荒廢,最適當的進步對於土地,可行性 復原和修復計畫,和許多其他的評價情形。
在市場中有在補給之間的極端揮發性或嚴格的不均衡的特點而且要求,財產的最高和最好使用可能是將來的使用一個把持。 在其他的情形中,在哪裡一些類型的可能最高的和最好的使用是可以確認的, 評價者應該討論如此的替代選擇使用並且預期了將來的收入和費用水準。
土地使用哪裡,而且土地劃分是在改變的狀態中哪裡,立即最高的和最好使用
財產可能是一種暫時的使用。 最高的和最好的使用觀念是一個基本的和整體部份 市場價格估計。
2005-05-12 05:38:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
土地被視為一個永久的資產,但是進步在或者之上到土地有有限的生活。 因為土地的不動性,每個不動產包裹持有一個獨特的地點。 土地的永久也意謂它通常將被期望較使用和進步經久,這有有限的生活。
土地的獨特特性決定它的最佳實效。 當改良的土地從進步到或者土地之上分開的被評價的時候,經濟的原則需要進步到或在那之上
2005-05-12 08:02:03 · answer #2 · answered by 鐵仔 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
me too.....
2005-05-12 05:28:26 · answer #3 · answered by 行走知識江湖TONY哥 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Err... I agree with ermrkiti3131.
2005-05-12 05:23:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋