Auxilio!! tarea de ingles. Me ayudan?

Question

Me piden hacer una carta informal con 250 palabras. Son puntos para excentar. Si eres tan amable de hacerla completa wow! mil gracias de verdad me sacas de un apuro!! todo en la vida se recompensa. Si no, puedes participar y agregar algo y asi que los demas vayas dandole secuancia hasta que sean las 250. Gracias de nuevo!! Aqui estare en vela revisando, es para mañana!!

porfavor... no se burlen, solo necesito ayuda no se que hacer.. y por eso recurri a esto, esto es serio!! no la hago yo porque no se nada

Answer 1

Más informal que esto...


"Dear Mr. Freud:

The proposal of the League of Nations and its International Institute of Intellectual Co-operation at Paris that I should invite a person, to be chosen by myself, to a frank exchange of views on any problem that I might select affords me a very welcome opportunity of conferring with you upon a question which, as things now are, seems the most insistent of all the problems civilization has to face. This is the problem: Is there any way of delivering mankind from the menace of war? It is common knowledge that, with the advance of modern science, this issue has come to mean a matter of life and death for Civilization as we know it; nevertheless, for all the zeal displayed, every attempt at its solution has ended in a lamentable breakdown.

I believe, moreover, that those whose duty it is to tackle the problem professionally and practically are growing only too aware of their impotence to deal with it, and have now a very lively desire to learn the views of men who, absorbed in the pursuit of science, can see world problems in the perspective distance lends. As for me, the normal objective of my thought affords no insight into the dark places of human will and feeling. Thus, in the inquiry now proposed, I can do little more than to seek to clarify the question at issue and, clearing the ground of the more obvious solutions, enable you to bring the light of your far-reaching knowledge of man's instinctive life to bear upon the problem. There are certain psychological obstacles whose existence a layman in the mental sciences may dimly surmise, but whose interrelations and vagaries he is incompetent to fathom; you, I am convinced, will be able to suggest educative methods, lying more or less outside the scope of politics, which will eliminate these obstacles.

As one immune from nationalist bias, I personally see a simple way of dealing with the superficial (i.e., administrative) aspect of the problem: the setting up, by international consent, of a legislative and judicial body to settle every conflict arising between nations. Each nation would undertake to abide by the orders issued by this legislative body, to invoke its decision in every dispute, to accept its judgments unreservedly and to carry out every measure the tribunal deems necessary for the execution of its decrees. But here, at the outset, I come up against a difficulty; a tribunal is a human institution which, in proportion as the power at its disposal is inadequate to enforce its verdicts, is all the more prone to suffer these to be deflected by extrajudicial pressure. This is a fact with which we have to reckon; law and might inevitably go hand in hand, and juridical decisions approach more nearly the ideal justice demanded by the community (in whose name and interests these verdicts are pronounced) insofar as the community has effective power to compel respect of its juridical ideal. But at present we are far from possessing any supranational organization competent to render verdicts of incontestable authority and enforce absolute submission to the execution of its verdicts. Thus I am led to my first axiom: The quest of international security involves the unconditional surrender by every nation, in a certain measure, of its liberty of action--its sovereignty that is to say--and it is clear beyond all doubt that no other road can lead to such security.

The ill success, despite their obvious sincerity, of all the efforts made during the last decade to reach this goal leaves us no room to doubt that strong psychological factors are at work which paralyze these efforts. Some of these factors are not far to seek. The craving for power which characterizes the governing class in every nation is hostile to any limitation of the national sovereignty. This political power hunger is often supported by the activities of another group, whose aspirations are on purely mercenary, economic lines. I have especially in mind that small but determined group, active in every nation, composed of individuals who, indifferent to social considerations and restraints, regard warfare, the manufacture and sale of arms, simply as an occasion to advance their personal interests and enlarge their personal authority.

But recognition of this obvious fact is merely the first step toward an appreciation of the actual state of affairs. Another question follows hard upon it: How is it possible for this small clique to bend the will of the majority, who stand to lose and suffer by a state of war, to the service of their ambitions. (*) An obvious answer to this question would seem to be that the minority, the ruling class at present, has the schools and press, usually the Church as well, under its thumb. This enables it to organize and sway the emotions of the masses, and makes its tool of them.

Yet even this answer does not provide a complete solution. Another question arises from it: How is it that these devices succeed so well in rousing men to such wild enthusiasm, even to sacrifice their lives? Only one answer is possible. Because man has within him a lust for hatred and destruction. In normal times this passion exists in a latent state, it emerges only in unusual circumstances; but it is a comparatively easy task to call it into play and raise it to the power of a collective psychosis. Here lies, perhaps, the crux of all the complex factors we are considering, an enigma that only the expert in the lore of human instincts can resolve.

And so we come to our last question. Is it possible to control man's mental evolution so as to make him proof against the psychosis of hate and destructiveness? Here I am thinking by no means only of the so-called uncultured masses. Experience proves that it is rather the so-called "intelligentsia" that is most apt to yield to these disastrous collective suggestions, since the intellectual has no direct contact with life in the raw but encounters it in its easiest, synthetic form--upon the printed page.

To conclude: I have so far been speaking only of wars between nations; what are known as international conflicts. But I am well aware that the aggressive instinct operates under other forms and in other circumstances. (I am thinking of civil wars, for instance, due in earlier days to religious zeal, but nowadays to social factors; or, again, the persecution of racial minorities.) But my insistence on what is the most typical, most cruel and extravagant form of conflict between man and man was deliberate, for here we have the best occasion of discovering ways and means to render all armed conflicts impossible.

I know that in your writings we may find answers, explicit or implied, to all the issues of this urgent and absorbing problem. But it would be of the greatest service to us all were you to present the problem of world peace in the light of your most recent discoveries, for such a presentation well might blaze the trail for new and fruitful modes of action.

Yours very sincerely,

A. Einstein"

Answer 2

Mejor en lugar de estar revisando cualquier cosa en internet ponte a hacer la tarea corazon, asi no vas a aprender.

Answer 3

busque una noticia que ya esté en inglés (ny situations) y fíjese que en las construcciones se use la forma SUJETO + HAVE + VERBO EN -ED o participio pasado. Por ejemplo: human beings have won nutrition from distinct components...

Answer 4

te conviene ponerte a escribir y no a chatear o algo en la PC solo consentrate

Answer 5

deja de perder el tiempo y apurate a hacertu tarea
oes mal planpero asi nunkentenderas
creeeme

Answer 6

Informal sería más o menos así:

Dear Katherine,

First of all I want you to know that all the members of my family are ok, hope the same for your entire family....

...Since I was at elementary school, I thought that our friendship went into a bad way. Maybe it was because both of us misunderstood lots of.....

.... although that, I want you to sorry me, if any time I bother or offended you. There's no better way to start over than saying "Im sorry".

If you accept my apologize I will be really glad, otherwise I'm gonna understand it.

Without anything else to say, I wish you a very happy year.

Friendly,

Fulanito de tal.

Obviamente te pongo un ejemplo muy breve, pero puedes tomarlo y completar un poco las palabras restantes. Como es informal, no creo que necesite fecha, en caso contario, puedes agregarla.

Saludos y suerte. Recuerda que la mejor técnica para aprender y mejorar cualquier habilidad es practicando. Feliz año.

Answer 7

No seas Mediocre!!!! Asi no vas a aprender nada!!!
Hacete cargo de tus responsabilidades. Por gente como vos existe la ley del menor esfuerzo.

Answer 8

oie ps si cuesta trabajo hacer las cosas.. ya me imagino si estudiaras arquitectura como yo... te hubieras rajado desde el primer dia de clases... asi no vas a aprender. pero si lo ke te interesa es un 70... copiate...

Answer 9

do your own ******* homework !!

Answer 10

HiI wash asw sadw faws jhuf wias asaw sadw awf yfgsd awfasf saygwwajhd aweguw wjhkadwf awf djhfwf awafasw whjafawfa wfawfe rdwatwr wyafw fes wda wdjkhaw dwad wswdw dwdawd awda da d f w ws ehjfsef efse sf eaw geskkj aewbawej awjawawbahkrw gfsiniaqw waw raw wash jwasha wishi chingao awaw wajdw awawe awe fucki THE END.
Exento carnal.