Ha Ha. I get it, trick question "get down", Bill. Ha Ha. Take care.
2007-11-28 07:20:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by R J 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Being in "National Politics" is not necessarily the best path to the Presidency. A sitting member of congress has not won the Presidency since Kennedy in 1960. So claiming MORE experience in the Senate than a competitor is not really as big an advantage as you think. Most recent presidents have NOT been in national politics before winning the Presidency. Bush was a Governor Clinton was a Governor Reagan was a Governor Carter was a Governor Eisenhower held no previous political post but was certainly a national leadership figure, but that is over half a century ago. Bush sr, and Nixon were VPs and they are the exceptions rather than the rule.
2016-05-26 05:38:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be honest, I wouldn't vote for any of the three listed.
Barack Obama wrote a book which put his name out there. But, he wants to give grants/scholarships to illegal aliens as he stated at a visit to California at Garfield High School. I can't see giving free money to someone who is here illegally - just doesn't seem fair. Also, he is a CFR member, and his wife, Michele, works on the Board of Directors for the CFR headquarters in Chicago.
Hillary Clinton - I do not trust at all. Her ties to the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, United Nations, and the Bilderberg Group just tells me she wants to sell out our country. Bill Clinton signed unfair GATT and NAFTA about 15 years ago into being and look where it put us...the Clinton's and the Bush family have very strong ties to one another...so, while we were watching the sexual antics of Bill Clinton with Lewinsky, Flowers, and the other ladies on the list our country was starting to change by the pen of Bill Clinton but we didn't actually see that change unitl time had passed. Look up GATT/CAFTA/NAFTA on google and check it out.
The middle class production jobs that once paid $20 to $25 an hour with full benefits have been vanquished by the forces of Free Trade. The USA has gone through the most massive dislocation of jobs in its history. It is a sad state and Hillary Clinton may just make it even worse...Remember her quote: "We are the president."
The Clintons hate the military, she more than him. Yet, reports say, they micromanaged their numerous attacks from the White House while Bill was in office. And even though neither Clinton has any military experience, we now have this two headed, disgrace for a future presidency and on the brink of starting World War III.
Back in the Feb. 12, 1998 issue of "The Hill," Clinton's confidant, campaign co-conspirator and fellow pervert, Dick Morris, writes that Hillary is taking over most presidential duties:
The coup was bloodless and, most likely, wordless. The minute President Clinton was thrown irredeemably on the defensive on Jan. 21 -- the very day he began his sixth year in office -- Hillary took over. Not just the scandal defense but the building itself. The bargain is clear to both the president and the first lady. She need never articulate it. He intuits it. Here's the deal: She'll bail him out of this mess, but, now, she calls the shots.
The president, hanging by his wife's largesse, knows enough to step aside. From now on it will be her appointments, her policies, her positions that get green lights. The formal staff of the White House will have to take a back seat reminiscent of the health care reform days.
Folks, that whirling sound you hear coming from Virginia is not some sort of secret military device. That's George Washington, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson spinning in their graves. We've got a Marxist, feminist, with an obnoxious attitude as the soon to possibly be Chief Executive Officer of this country.
If I had to pick - it would be Bill Clinton since we know his history and could watch his every move. Then Impeach him, for both past atrocities and future atrocities.
2007-11-28 06:25:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by kymeth 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
None of the above. The only decent candidate the Dems put out will never get the chance. Joe Biden is better than all the others you mentioned. Funny thing is that since he can have some appeal to the independents and the center leaning republicans he will never get the nod. The Democratic party has let media and the opinions it generates have way too much sway over the policies they put in practice.
2007-11-28 05:40:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Tough choice. I am torn between Bill and Obama. How about Bill as the president and Obama as vice. I like that only cuz Bill has proven himself to be a great prez. Obama is still young and has plenty of time to rise to glory in the future.
2007-11-28 12:49:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by spartan-117 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bill Clinton
2007-11-28 05:43:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by shannay 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'm not into nepotism. One clinton was ENOUGH.
Barak says he doesn't support noticfication of parents when their under-age children get abortions. He lost my vote right there. He favors more federal funding for health care, just where is he gonna get the money? (possibly our paychecks through higher taxes)? perhaps higher insurance premiums, or higher costs for doctor visits, or higher pescription prices. He's gotta rob peter to pay paul somewhere, and it may as well be you and me.
Check out votematch.com :)
2007-11-28 06:57:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not too stealthy. Your loaded questions stick out like a sore thumb. It just makes you NeoCons look sneaky, the old "dirty tricks" party circa Nixon, and backfires, everytime you post. Ha, what a joke.
Would vote for none of the above.
2007-11-28 06:39:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by JIM 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
None of the above. You have a liar, a power hungry monger and a racist. I'd NEVER vote for any of them.
2007-11-28 06:11:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think i would vote for my pet cat before any of those socialists... Even if you put a gun to my head, I wouldnt vote for any of them, so my order of preference is of no consequence.
2007-11-28 06:02:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by eyesofruby1979 3
·
1⤊
0⤋