English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-19 09:56:07 · 27 answers · asked by ? 2 in Sports Football (American)

27 answers

VJX- I gave you a thumbs up!!!

Yes the Packers are the best in the NFC! Dallas' defense is giving up way too many points. GB does best when Favre puts the ball in the air.

The cowgirls talk about how the Packers can't run...well guess what? The Packers will shut down the cowgirls run game too so neither team will run. HOwever, GB is getting better with rushing each week. The vikings never game up a hundred yards rushing to a player all season and Grant got over 100 yards. The vikings defense is better than the cowgirl defense especially against the run. As yesterday showed, TO is the only real reputable WR for the cowgirls. He scored all 4 of their td's. GB will shut him down, pressure Romo, and cause several turnovers. Packers will do it better than the Bills but the Pack will finish it off unlike the bills did.

GB is for real this season. It isn't a fluke and you can't say they had an easy schedule. 4 of their opponents were in the playoffs last year and GB beat them. GB can't control their schedule and all they can control is winning ball games. The Pack deserves credit for having a great season! We will all find out who is the better team on the 29th but in the meantime, GB has business to take care of in Detroit.

2007-11-19 11:31:12 · answer #1 · answered by My girls love the Packers too! 6 · 1 1

I am a big Green Bay fan and I hate the Cowboys so I go with the Packers. Brett Favre is the best QB in the NFC, and could be the best QB in the league. And the Cowboys only option is to throw to Owens which will be stopped by Al Harris and Charles Woodson.

The Pack win:27-13 over the Cowboys

2007-11-19 11:47:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. I'm tired of people saying Dallas is so great. They're good, not great. They're not special. They won't "destroy" Green Bay. They can't even destroy Minnesota or Buffalo. They barely beat the injured Washington Redskins yesterday.

And people who say Dallas is better because they're in the NFC East are either retarded or blind. Green Bay is 3 - 0 against the NFC East. So before coming here and proving how little you know, watch football first.

Jason Campbell just put up 348 yards on Dallas. How exactly are they going to stop Brett Favre and the Packers' passing game when they can't stop WASHINGTON from passing?

Give me thumbs down. 95% of you are idiots.

2007-11-19 11:19:02 · answer #3 · answered by Jinton 3 · 1 0

On paper they are. They answer all the X's and O's. They have a better QB (which is substantial) and answer the TO question with the best corners in the league. GB has the best D line to shut down Dallas running game. But they play on the 29th at Dallas, where Dallas will be playing their 3rd home game and GB will be playing their 2nd consecutive road game and 3rd game in 11 days (VERY TOUGH) If GB wins, they are clearly, the better team. If its a very close game, late in the fourth, I think GB pulls it out. If its an as*whooping against GB, they still have a chance in the NFC Championship game. Will be a great game.

2007-11-19 10:21:36 · answer #4 · answered by James D 2 · 2 0

Although I hate to say it, Them Cowboys are the best team in the NFC. I think they will beat the Packers by a touchdown or two when they meet in a few weeks.

2007-11-20 02:57:03 · answer #5 · answered by mmattis21 3 · 0 0

yes and this is why. Dallas are a great team, we know that. But I believe they are at their peak. I don't see them getting really any better because of how they have played all their games this season.Their games seems to be pretty much the same each week which is fine. Nothing is wrong with that. But when I see GB playing and the # of WR Favre throws a TD pass to, that blows me away. They are young team who continues to get better and who's running game seems to be coming around even though Grant got injured yesterday. They are explosive but are very settle about it. I don't think they need to beat "good" teams to show how good they are. One thing that the Packers do that I don't see too much from Dallas is make a huge comeback in the game when it's needed. Yeah you can say Dallas are that good to where they don't need to make a comback, they score right away, but that is what's scary about GB. Right when you think the game is over, they come back with a good drive and score. now the game is serious and you've given Favre another chance to score.

so I do think the Packers are the better team in the NFC because I see them getting better vs. the Boys going as high as I think they can go. But I still don't under estimate them.

2007-11-19 10:06:07 · answer #6 · answered by Reese 6 · 5 1

Absoultely not!
The packers have the ability to win the super bowl on their own terms, that is to say, not haveing to win the game on what should win a game.
What should win a game is , running, passing, few turnovers, and no bad ref calls.
The packers are not consistent in running or passing without giving up more than they earn.
The packers will win cause farbve knows what to take advantage of, and his receivers know how to catch the ball.
The running game will be ok if they can get a few long gains.
The defense and field goal team will have to get farbve closer to the goal line.
A field goal near the end of the game or in overtime would be nice.. lol :)

2007-11-19 11:05:13 · answer #7 · answered by gods creation 5 · 1 1

The analysts on Nfl community are idiots. the Ravens-Falcons game, They mispronounced gamers names and referred to as the Ravens, the Raiders. As for the main suitable group, i might vote Falcons at this factor with the Bears a distinctive 2nd. Falcons have all factors of the sport clicking acceptable now and that they are unstoppable at residing house. Matt Ryan proves repeatedly that he can lead his group to victory with little time on the clock. The Bears have a super protection and the offense is beginning to gel. Packers haven't any working game and the Eagles do no longer run sufficient (with their rb's), in my opinion.

2016-11-12 03:20:59 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

lets see does dallas have very good 5 wide recievers as green bay does or strong front four as a offensive line and a defense that are really good and lets face it they stopped #2 against the run but of course green bay is 13-1 starting from last year when they put jenkings as end but of course this will be good test for the youngest defense in legue but i think it will be close

2007-11-19 10:30:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

We will find out after Green Bay and Dallas Play in week 13.

But if you look at the following stats you can make some assumptions:
Green Bay opponents scored 159 points compared to Dallas opponents scoring 197.
Green Bay has scored 259 points compared to Dallas scoring 345.

Score-wise Green Bay's Defense is better than Dallas's defense. And Dallas's offense is better than Green Bay's.

Each team has these schedule similarities:
1 game vs Chicago. Dallas won by 14, Green Bay lost by 7.
1 gave vs PHI. DAL won by 21, GB won by 3.
1 game vs. WAS. DAL won by 5, GB won by 3.
Vs NYG. Dallas won by 10, 11 in 2 games; GB won by 22.
Vs MN. Dallas won by 10, GB by 7, 34 in 2 games.
In common opponents Dallas has a +1 victory and +11 points.

The combined record of DAL opponents is 49-51 while GB opponents are 46-53 (DEN plays tonight).

If you take the record of the team at the time of the match-ups; Dallas teams were 22-22; GB teams were 20-25. Not that it matters early in the season because Week 2 it was DAL v MIA and MIA was 0-1. GB played NY who were 0-1.

All that fancy math and stats and it is looking like is is pretty balanced with a slight edge going to Dallas.

Again, we will find out when they go toe-to-toe. But we will find out again on the last day of the season (whomever loses will have to recover from said loss).

2007-11-19 10:46:45 · answer #10 · answered by Chris W 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers