2007-11-08 12:58:14 · 11 answers · asked by Elutherian 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Let me be more specific: She voted for the war and funding of it. She was for the war about a year ago until she decided to run.
also at the debate she was a complete flopper on the illegal immigrant issue.
Oh and not to mention her "secret documents" scandal from the first white house stay.
2007-11-08 13:06:03 · update #1
And to be clear, Gearge W. is just as much a liar, Let's keep this about your candidate though.
2007-11-08 13:07:15 · update #2
I am voting for Ron Paul. I think he will uphold the constitution 100% more than George W.
2007-11-08 13:13:37 · answer #1 · answered by acedelux 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
First of all she voted for the President to have the power to force Itaq to comply with UN resolutions - not for an open ended illegal occupation of a sovereign nation.
She continues to fund the same because our irresponsible president has made it clear he is prepared to keep our troops there without proper funding. So her position on the war is in no way inconsistent.
On the debate she did not perform well - but she has made clear her position on that since.
You offer no evidence whatsoever of any documents scandal. There are outstanding FOIA requests from the Clinton administration - as there are from the Reagan administration.
If this is the best you can do - twist the truth to try to make Clinton look dishonest - then you guys really are in trouble next November
2007-11-08 22:53:37 · answer #2 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, she voted for the war because she BELIEVED the White House (like most of us did) when they said there were WMD in Iraq. When she found out there weren't any (because hubby Bill bombed all the factories) she was against the war like the rest of us.
What kind of "secret documents" would Hillary have had from the White House anyway? Aren't you concerned at all about VP Dirty Dick Cheney's secret documents that he refuses to give up? What could Hillary be possibly be hiding? Cheney's hiding enough to be executed fot treason...
Yeah, most politicians talk out of the corner of their mouth but not like the current administration that is doing it at the expense of thousands of US lives, millions of US jobs and Trillions of dollars in fuel that their greedy buddys are making off us...
Get real man...
2007-11-08 21:28:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary was duped, just like us. I don't see this as "dishonest".
She made the horrible mistake of believing her President and Colin Powell, his royal lackey.
Yeah, she's a bit weasely on some issues but that's just what any politician does. Who doesn't weasel right now?
As for 'secret documents" that's just the Lie Machine at work again.
Hillary was never found dishonest convicted of dishonesty, or proven dishonest by anyone.
Accused, oh sure. But proven. Never.
2007-11-08 22:12:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
How clever you are. Claim dishonesty, but offer no proof. Let's run this down. Who lied about Iraq and weapons of MD? Could it be Hillary? Nooooooo it's Georgie, or Dickie, or Colin, or Condaleeza or anyone else associated with the present administration. I am always amused at the way individuals attack the front runners by throwing claims without merit out there and letting them fester on their own. Personally, I haven't decided yet who I'm supporting, but it will only be after careful evaluation and in the best interest of all citizens of the US and the world, and not just the ones who have the money to buy their way into good favor.
2007-11-08 21:04:48 · answer #5 · answered by Ice 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The responses are just like Hillary's!
Instead of standing up for themselves and saying what they like about her, which is apparently nothing, they attack Bush.
That approach won't work when the primaries are over. Bush is not running for reelection and Rudy will come armed to the teeth as to why the independent should not vote for Hillary.
2007-11-08 21:10:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It has become a fashion and pastime for some uninformed persons to criticize badly and accuse with out adequate supporting information.
2007-11-08 22:10:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
sorry but if you were to give a lie detector test to all the candidates they would refuse to answer the questions. so theres no point in throwing stones at her when we have to throw them at everyone else as well.
2007-11-08 22:08:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's what I keep wondering about people who voted for George Bush.
2007-11-08 21:02:16 · answer #9 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
You have to be more specific . dishonesty in what area?
2007-11-08 21:02:27 · answer #10 · answered by Jack F 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋