2007-11-08 12:27:20 · 29 answers · asked by politicallypuzzeled 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You know when Hitler took over Germany some of these same arguments about it "never will happen", "we have laws to prevent it", "YOU'RE CRAZY to think that will happen" were used just like they are being used here.
2007-11-08 13:00:36 · update #1
Jerry C, yes there is, look up executive directive 51. according to that, any "catastrophe" anywhere in the world, with any level of effects, can postpone the election (if bush so chooses)
2007-11-08 12:31:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 6⤋
Hypothetically say this were to happen.
Realistically the congress would impeach
but being a Democrat and seeing how wimpy Reid/Pelosi are
They probably would be too scared to do anything.
Time will Tell, George will probably ride off into the sunset
and go live in his castle located in Dubai
2007-11-08 13:00:20 · answer #2 · answered by crossingover 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it really is unusual, human beings look dissatisfied through your question yet do not get dissatisfied at the same time as someone asks, if the terrorists ought to vote who ought to they vote for and the overpowering answer changed into Hillary, that changed into humorous. So human beings do not imagine our President ought to attempt this style of flow? i wager we've multiple slow freshmen in our u . s . is all i can say. i ought to ask your self the position each and each and every of the second one modification human beings were if no longer contained in the streets of Washington. i must be proper right here writing my representatives stressful they get him out of workplace and go back u . s . to human beings and placed that dictator on trial for treason.
2016-10-23 21:38:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the Servent of American who is choosed by Majority of American. So he can never do so. Where as President of Pakistan General Parabej is Dictetor who is never elected.
Definately American practice freedom so they cant tolorate any dictatorship decision. thts why they will protest not only like Pakastani did but greater than than if Bush di that.
2007-11-08 12:43:46 · answer #4 · answered by sureswinter100 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It surprises me that people who ask these types of questions dont realize just how crazy they are.
Bush will leave and whoever is elected will get sworn in just like has been done from day one. And then after he leaves you cats will still claim that he is a dictator
2007-11-08 12:36:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bush doesn't want to be president any longer. He just wants to go back to Crawford and drink himself into oblivion. I say, "Go Georgie! Drink! Enjoy! Go pull a Ronnie Reagan and be silent in your retirement."
2007-11-08 12:58:24 · answer #6 · answered by jersey girl in exile 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry... Bush isn't a crazy as you may think. The elections will continue.
2007-11-08 12:37:49 · answer #7 · answered by JD Zombie 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What evidence is there that he's not going to let the elections be held? There is no way he'd get away with that, as democracy provides government the strongest possible protection against revolution and without it, he's probably on his way to the guillotine.
2007-11-08 12:32:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 3⤋
They would need to do more than protest. If that were to happen I would hope they would take up arms.
2007-11-08 12:45:32 · answer #9 · answered by Dan H 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you try living on this planet for a change. any facts to back up your outlandish claim, or just another (yawn) Bush basher?
2007-11-08 12:42:10 · answer #10 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋