When is this jerk gonna' stop using American lives to further his agendas?
2007-10-30 12:44:15 · 17 answers · asked by charlie the 2na 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Many 'ney sayers in the "support Bush" group...
It's on the news, I couldn't make up an idiot as bad as this Pres.
2007-10-30 13:29:07 · update #1
When did he say that?
2007-10-30 12:47:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
According to the administration if you don't support the war or the troops, you are unpatriotic, they have said that from the start and still use 911 to make it look as though they were right. Congress should have never given him the power to start a war whenever he wanted to. He should not have lied to Congress and the country to start the war. Now comes the question how will this war be paid for? This is borrowed money and sooner or later your tax's will go up or Government services will go down.
2007-10-30 19:54:25 · answer #2 · answered by searching 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
People who resort to arguments and statements like that usually means they know they are on the wrong side and they a loosing arguments so they resort to using sensitive issues such as American soldier lifes to spice up and spit out cheap demagogues.
2007-10-30 19:56:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering most of that money is not even going to support our troops, it is mostly going in to no bid contracts making industries and CEO's rich on our troops good name.
Bottom Line:
Bush is saying support our troops, so my buddies can get rich off them.
2007-10-30 20:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by suanniiq 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, our do-nothing Democrats in Congress are going to grandstand a bit to get political mileage out of it and then they're going to bend over and take it up the tailpipe and whine about it later.
I'm not sure who's worse: Bush for being a murderous, genocidal, traitorous idiot - or the Democrats in Congress for being disengenous spineless wimps.
2007-10-30 19:51:42 · answer #5 · answered by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
supporting the troops and supporting the war are two entirely diff things. He can have enough money to bring all the troops home as fast as is technically, physically, safely possible and no more.
2007-10-30 19:55:35 · answer #6 · answered by amazed we've survived this l 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That 200 billion is to protect them and help building in Iraq, are you against helping save troops and build Iraqi houses that we blew up? You guys seemed so passionate that they blew up, but you don't want our money being spent to help rebuild Iraq? HYPOCRITE!
2007-10-30 19:57:05 · answer #7 · answered by godgunsandgl0ry 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not until the congress grows a pair. When will the congress stand up for what the American people want and get our troops home?
2007-10-30 19:47:55 · answer #8 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Would you freaking people actually bring some proof when we make outrageous statements like this. Oh, right I forgot, the Democratic party practices blind obedience.
2007-10-30 19:57:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The sad part is that congress will do it. Why does he still have a blank check when it comes to the war is my question? He says jump and congress says how high?
2007-10-30 19:48:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
wow....the pelosireid regime is certainly getting creative.
first, who did he say this to and when
second, if this was public, do you think for one second nancy pelosi or harry reid wouldnt have seen this as a golden opportunity for more villification and done so...cmon
third...WHAT AGENDA. it seems to me with the ridiculous stunt in syria and the harry reid all nighter that the democrats have much more agenda than simply the proper defense against al qaeda.
your question unfortunately has no answer as your premise is muddled and im having trouble sifting through the diatribe. you need to be more clear and repost, thanks.
2007-10-30 19:50:55 · answer #11 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋