2007-10-02 08:43:52 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment ➔ Global Warming
Nazi may be over-kill.
A better illustration would be Chicken Little.
2007-10-02 08:51:28 · answer #1 · answered by fkd1015 4 · 4⤊ 8⤋
No no no! The Nazi's are part of the Right wing. The Left Wing is the Communists and Socialists. If you want to knock Al Gore by comparing him to historic figures, Stalin or Lenin would be more appropriate, or perhaps KGB.
2007-10-02 10:16:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You must be of the "other" religion, the non-believer that thinks science is all a question of "Do you believe it, or not?"
But, what if it is true?
What if our grand children bake because we did nothing?
You don't want to have any? OK, Have a Good Life.
Do you ever wonder if you owe somebody something for all America has given you? Like the sacrifices of World War II, do you owe anything to anyone?
I guess, as far as you are concerned, they died in vain and you wish everyone spoke German, or Japanese?
No living German or Japanese would agree with you.
If you care for nobody's grand children and care for nothing, you owe nothing. Go read a book and Good Luck!
2007-10-02 09:46:11 · answer #3 · answered by baypointmike 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. And calling someone a Nazi who was not in fact a member of the German National Socialist movement of the 1930's and 1940's is not accurate and is never productive.
2007-10-02 09:32:22 · answer #4 · answered by cosmo 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
maybe you should be asking: "What is a Nazi?" in the politic area of Y!A before you choke on your foot. You obviously don't know what a Nazi is yet so there is no use comparing Al Gore to one.
2007-10-02 09:00:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
He may be a bafoon but Nazi?? Naw, he's just jumping on the most advertised bandwagon travelling around right now. Just like so many others who use their notoriety to make a stand, right or wrong.
2007-10-02 09:59:37 · answer #6 · answered by Marcy B 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure. And 99% of the world's scientists are in the Party, too.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,481085,00.html
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM040507.pdf
The world's leaders, also.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0924/p01s01-wogi.html
Major business leaders march in step.
Ford Motor Company CEO William Clay Ford, Jr. "I believe there is now more than enough evidence of climate change to warrant an immediate and comprehensive - but considered - response. Anyone who disagrees is, in my view, still in denial."
"The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now."
James Rogers, CEO of Charlotte-based Duke Energy.
"Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."
Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart Company
Conservatives with Ph.D.s are party leaders.
"Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich challenged fellow conservatives to stop resisting scientific evidence of global warming"
But, think about it. Al Gore can't be just a Nazi. He must be an alien. Singlehandedly he's accomplished all this.
Or maybe global warming is real?
Nah, who could possibly believe that?
Oh, all those people above. And this guy, dummy that he is:
"I wasn’t convinced by a person or any interest group—it was the data that got me. I was utterly convinced of this connection between the burning of fossil fuels and climate change. And I was convinced that if we didn’t do something about this, we would be in deep trouble.”
Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret.)
Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut and the first Commander of the Naval Space Command
2007-10-02 09:01:04 · answer #7 · answered by Bob 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Dear Liberalchi.
No, but Martin Durkin is the global warming hack producer/writer.
2007-10-02 08:53:23 · answer #8 · answered by James Bond 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. It is a concern the human population should be concerned with. It's just convienent for him to preach it ritght now with the 08 election. Next he will say he is running 4 prez again...
2007-10-02 10:25:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
just to coach and tell the lots regarding the hazards of AGW. Is the stunning purpose of deniers to word propaganda to grant the pretend journey between people who do now no longer carry on with technological expertise heavily that AGW is a political undertaking.
2016-10-10 04:28:08 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds good to me, I would have said the global warming nut, but hey that works too.
2007-10-02 09:55:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋