We can't find Osama because the libs are too soft on terrorism. (And with the Patriot Act, there should be NO excuse.)
We can't stop immigration because the libs don't want us to. (And yet Homeland Security is a Republican Gestapo, charged with doing whatever it takes to make our country secure.)
Libs don't know anything about foriegn policy. (And yet we are attacking Iraq when a nuclear power is born next door.)
Don't follow the mandates of Congress. (Here's a link to demonstrate Bush's refusal to enforce laws enacted by Congress.)
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/59/19450
Don't know how to combat terrorism. (Here's a link showing the rise of terrorism in the MidEast since the 'war on terror began.)
http://www.tkb.org/IncidentRegionModule.jsp?startDate=01%2F01%2F2002&endDate=09%2F15%2F2007&domInt=0&suiInt=0&filter=0&detail=0&info=&info1=&pagemode=regional®ionid=&countryid=&sortby=&imageField.x=35&imageField.y=6
Don't care about vetrans. (I won't even dignify that one with a response.)
Scandal ridden, no morals, only care about hedonistic pleasures and a free ride. (Once again...look in the mirror.)
That's all I've got.....for now.
2007-09-21 15:45:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
uhhh no but it must be a DNC rule #1 to misinform their base (AKA LIE) to motivate them.
$10T? Is that Trillion? Are you seriously saying that Clinton had $10 TRILLION A YEAR SURPLUS!!!!! He could have paid off the entire national debt in one year......I think you mean billion, and speaking of debt, guess where that surplus went to? Not paying down the debt, but affording NEW spending while maintaining the interest payments on our debts. See you are a bit confused with governmental expense terms. Surplus means the amount in the positive for the fiscal year, deficit is the amount negative, debt is what is owed total. Clinton did NOT pay any of the debt down with that surplus (which btw help me out..what did he do exactly beside ride the dot.com wave of the 90's in tax revenue and we saw what happened there....that wasn't real money that he was taxing and they were paying)
Won Bosnia? Then clearly we have no troops there right? Oh...we do? That's strange...it's only been a decade and there is STILL fighting going on there. Oh but wait, when Clinton takes down the dictator of a country that is a victory and the in-fighting that happens afterwards are just civil crimes....when Bush does the EXACT SAME THING we are still at war, the coutnry falls into civil war, and we are "loosing" no less. Nice consistency there chief.
Calling you on your claim of Bush destroying the Constitution. WHAT EXACTLY DID HE DO THAT WAS NOT DONE BY PRIOR PRESIDENTS?
2007-09-22 00:23:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by emp 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
what i have to wonder is why the heck we were in Bosnia in the first place? Were the Serbs a threat to national security, were they backing terrorist groups or building WMD? When I look at spending bills I see what they were suppose to cost in the first place then I see the riders placed in them by Democrats that raise the cost by 50% or better. So yes they are big spenders. I see Bush giving a tax cut to working Americans and the only people opposing it are Democrats.
I see Bush trying to save Social security by giving a small percentage of it back so we can contribute to IRAs or 401K plans, then I see wealthy Dems whining about how much money the treasury will lose if we do that. Funny it was the Dems that prorated SSI in the first place so they could fund their "war on poverty". Something that along with Vietnam they lost.
So don't talk bad about Bush, in my view hes doing a better job than any Democrat could have done.
2007-09-21 15:40:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
And here we have another fine example of Libatwit spin ! I Love the part about Clinton WON Bosnia ! See the thing is Libatwits some how think if they make something up like this and keep repeating it then it becomes true . Just doesn't get more pathetic then that! looks like you got all your fictitious information from Rosie O. And just like her you are wrong . Read some books . Like that's ever going to happen .That would indicate intelligence on your part . Don't see much chance of that happening ether . Funny thing is the one who gets picked by you is just as much of a libatwit as you unless you pick a Republican ! Ooo Oooo Time to change your dippers .
2007-09-21 18:49:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
lol this is genuinely humorous! i replaced into taking a adolescents progression type at school years in the past, and between the flaws it particularly mentions is to "in no way tell the youngster 'wait until your father/mom gets dwelling house." whilst the instructor asked us if it ever befell in our residences, the female next to me stated her mom have been doing it for years, yet her dad hasn't come dwelling house yet. we don't try this in the time of our dwelling house nonetheless. My son thinks the two me and Mr Dawna are the two evil.
2016-10-19 09:06:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by neher 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yes. Whenever they get caught in something bad they try to dig up something remotely tied to Bill Clinton to deflect the issue.
2007-09-21 16:28:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Silverkris 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They like to say that we're anti-military, draft dodgers; yet some most of them wormed their way out of serving with deferments and bogus medical excuses such as "anal cysts" and "flat feet." And Bush got out of serving in Vietnam by having his daddy get him into the National Guard--and he went AWOL on that, too!
2007-09-21 15:36:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yep...that's the game plan from the party that spends all day yakking about personal responsibility.
2007-09-21 15:32:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Everything you listed is untrue and makes you sound stupid. You may think that it doesn't...but as it turns out, it does.
2007-09-21 15:42:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Salsa Shark 4
·
0⤊
1⤋