Why will the U.N. not help with the stabilization of Iraq?

Answer 1

No, but they could run a scam on the Iraqi aid programs.

Answer 2

The U.N. is corrupt and liberal just like Iraq. The USA provides most of the funding for the U.N. and yet the U.N votes against the USA. When Libya is appointed the head of Human Rights Commission then you know something is wrong.

Answer 3

UN has became what was known as the League of Nations in the pre WW2 era.they are useless and bias.UN only serve to the countries who won WW2 like US,Russia,Britain,France and China.that's why they have veto power which could outpower any polls or resolution agreed by other err...say 100 nations.could you imagine...1 country could kick out resolution agreed by lots of other countries.it's not democratic.it's bully.

Answer 4

This is the consequence of George W. Bush rejecting, ridiculing, and insulting every other country in the world before he invaded Iraq.

Answer 5

The UN at one time may, I repeat, MAY have been useful, but not anymore. All they do is talk and fight amongst themselves. They should be disbanded and tossed right out of the headquarters in NY. It is just another way for terrorists to gain entry to the US legally.

I repeat, the UN is useless. Just as corrupt as can be.

Answer 6

That's right their office got bombed and they high tailed it, besides they got their share of Iraq from the oil for food program kick backs.

Answer 7

Because we entered without the support of the rest of the security counsel,,,,,those countries feel "you made the mess....you clean it up"

Answer 8

You guys don't remember?
They tried. Back in 03. Their headquarters was bombed by terrorists and they left.

Answer 9

The UN doesn't fight wars it is better at peacekeeping

Answer 10

The UN is useless, I should be disbanded