Americans, do you feel more comfortable with a Communal form...?

Question

...of government, or a Fascist form of government? Being Hillary Clinton favors Communal style government & Rudy Giuliani favors a Fascist style of government, I need your input on this. What advantage do you see in one over the other? Which would better control you & your fellow Americans?

Answer 1

Don't fool yourself. Both Hillary and Rudy are part of the same corporate capitalist system. One plays good cop or a so called 'softer' cop and the other one plays the bad cop or the gestapo (Giuliani). But the agenda and the goals are the same. They are both supported by the same corporations by huge amounts of money. Go buy the Fortune magazine with Hilary's portrait on the front and see where all the candidates are getting the majority of their money.

Answer 2

There seems to be some confusion over definition. Fascism is when the government controls private industry. Communal or communism is government ownership and control of all property.
A federal government that was fascist would control private industry to a degree stronger than is currently the case. We are closer to fascism than communism. In a communal or communist form, the government would own and operate all work sites. I believe that both Hillary and Rudy favor the fascist model. You see that in Senator Clinton proposed health care plan which still leaves the insurance companies and medical providers in their current roles. She wants to reduce large profits being made by oil companies but she does not want to nationalize them.
I believe that the communal or communist form is the best way to go. Just as a back seat driver is not helpful, neither is an industry that has an outside third party trying to second guess them. Let the industry be free to do the best job it can.

Answer 3

WOW
What a miriad of answers eh?

Look


Communism is a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism

So what you are saying is that hillary wants a self perpetuating government that always grows and is in charge of distributing everything

AND

That Guiliani wants complete power over everything so that he can use it to increase nationalism at any costs to the citizen regardless of the consequences


OK - looking at these two in this perspective - i would thikn hillary would win - why - because if people figure ot what guiliani is doing they will revolt - however - most people are too dumb to figure out what hillary would be doing until its too late - so hillary would win and hold off the enevitable for a few years

In either case - the revolution will becoming - so what can we do about it - well - theres ron paul - beyond that - i dont see another chance - by the next election in 2012 - it will be too late unless ron paul wins this time around

Answer 4

The only real difference between Fascists and Communists is that Fascists usually have snappier uniforms. The new Islamic Fascists are an aberration in this regard.

I'd prefer to be free, as would most Americans, but unfortunately most are still playing the lesser of two evils game.

Answer 5

Communism and Socialism are economic systems that require the coercive power of government in order to function. Fascism is that coercive power.

Fascism is a means, not a system. To equate the two is a logical fallacy.

Generally speaking, the difference between all the socialisms and Marxist socialism (Communism), is that Marx felt that capitalism was so successful that it could only be overtaken by violent means. Milder socialists believed, instead, that capitalism would naturally evolve into a socialist state. Both were wrong and stupid, and require fascism in order to implement their unnatural, inhuman systems.

Hate to use this as a podium to educate: please forgive me. Given the answers you've had so far, I believe the US socialist public education system is lacking...

Answer 6

examine your information. It has very few long term outcomes, the main severe being an bigger possibility of Alzheimer's, besides the undeniable fact that it is unknown if it is brought about via marijuana or via hereditary subject concerns. additionally, no person has died totally by fact of marijuana. somebody with an unknown wellness subject or bronchial asthma could have died while taking marijuana, however the marijuana did no longer kill them, their ailment did. it is likewise a possibility that the "killer marijuana" grew to become into laced with yet another drug which brought about the death. finally, human beings ought to have smoked marijuana and then executed something that have been given themselves killed, yet that's no longer the medicine fault the two. although if i'm extreme or no longer, i be responsive to extra constructive than to sled down a snowy hill right into a frozen pond bare. some stoners ought to think of that's humorous up till their pal dies, yet marijuana is to no longer blame. Idiots are. Alcohol has killed a lot of human beings, although if it is from under the effect of alcohol driving, alcohol poisoning, alcohol blending with drugs interior the physique or regrettably, Alcohol withdrawal. Marijuana has had no commonplace deadly outcomes, except you're allergic to the plant. solid question different than that. It grew to become unlawful by propaganda, yet why it continues to be unlawful is a secret to me.

Answer 7

Communism is an economic standard, not a political standard for those who don't know the difference.

As for Hillary favoring a Communist political style, which do you kind do you think it is?

I think she favors a style of government that is FOR the people.

Answer 8

neither.

socialism is for wimps and the weak willed. People who refuse to help themselves or get pissed when others work hard and benefit from the chances they take and the opportunities that they take advantage of.

fascism, nobody running for president is a fascist, nice try though.

Answer 9

Neither. I agree Hillary supports a Communist type government but Rudi doesn't support fascism.

Answer 10

The majority of people on here can't see into the future. You have to take baby steps with the verbage.