Is this sentence grammatical and natural?

Question

Yesterday I read a sentence in a book:
Kim is a person that everyone who knows really likes a lot.
Is this sentence grammatical and natural?

Answer 1

I don't think so. It seems to have one relative pronoun (that) introducing two relative clauses ("that everyone who knows" and "that everyone likes a lot") at the same time.

I would say "Kim is a person that (or whom) everyone who knows her (or him) likes a lot."

Answer 2

You should tell us what book you found it in to help us out. At first it seems correct, but I think that the general population does not actually read full sentences, and just skim over it (at least from experience). Breaking it down, it is difficult to make sense of it in one sentence.

Editors make mistakes, but I think I am going to have to say it is correct, assuming it is a book that was originally written in English. If it is an English textbook (and you are using us for your homework), or a book translated from another language, then I am not as sure.

I'm sorry I can't give you a real answer.

Answer 3

ya that sentence has problems. Who wrote that? It sounds better: Kim is a person that is liked a lot by everyone who knows her. You can add really between is/liked but i like it better w/out.

Answer 4

No, it doesn´t sound correct.
Kim is a person who is liked by everyone he knows.
I think this would be better grammatically.

Answer 5

grammatically correct, but confusing

Kim is a person who is liked by everyone who knows her

Answer 6

I'm not that good at english grammar, but I don't think it is, I would change it to read...
Kim is liked a lot by everyone she knows.

Answer 7

this is corect: "Kim is a person who everyone knows and realy likes a lot"

Answer 8

Use an adjective truly of an adverb on the tip of a sentence the place a threat. a. The organic environment demands reconstruction thoroughly. could desire to be: "The organic environment demands thorough reconstruction." b. The rules choose reinterpretation thoroughly. could desire to be: "The rules choose comprehensive reinterpretation." c. This initiative warrants reevaluation thoroughly. could desire to be: "This initiative warrants comprehensive reevaluation." d. The historic internet site desires reconstructing heavily. could desire to be: "The historic internet site desires careful reconstruction." e. The historic internet site desires reconstructing immediately. could desire to be: "The historic internet site desires speedy reconstruction." f. The historic internet site desires reconstructing on the instant. could desire to be: "The historic internet site desires on the spot reconstruction." g. The historic internet site desires reconstructing thoroughly. could desire to be: "The historic internet site desires comprehensive reconstruction." h. The historic internet site desires reconstructing completely. could desire to be: "The historic internet site desires ideal reconstruction." notice: i'm not sure if this is a grammatical rule, in spite of the undeniable fact that it form of feels to sound greater organic and 'circulate greater powerful' to me. possibly you are able to desire to lookup a internet site with information on the right use of adverbs. additionally, i could upload, sentence H nonetheless looks clumsy- purely no longer the way it may often be expressed, in my opinion, in spite of the actuality that i do no longer think of it breaks a grammatical rule. consistent with possibility it is going to be, "The historic internet site desires to be reconstructed completely" or "The historic internet site desires to be reconstructed to perfection." in spite of the undeniable fact that, even that's no longer a difficulty-unfastened context for an English speaker to apply the word 'ideal' (a minimum of no longer in my corner of the international). i desire this facilitates you. sturdy success with your analyze. you're doing very nicely for somebody who speaks English as a 2nd language- it may desire to be very complicated to learn.