English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Why is it that that weeks before the collapse, there was an electricity blackout in the complex? why is it, that people had report white dust covering the place weeks earlier? why was there damage at the bottom of the buildings when the plane had struck the top of the towers? why were explosions reported by fireman that were inside the building? why were these reports suppressed and never shown by the media? why were there explosions going off at the base of the towers before the towers collapse? why were there "squibs" seen as the towers were collapsing? why did the towers seen to fall at free fall speed? why did both building collapse in the exact same fashion? why was there a TV show produced and aired that year envisioning a plane hitting the WTC? why have so many people had reported explosions going off? why why why. then also why was the following anthrax attacks traced back to a military laboratory? why did the media drop that revelation and never speak of it again? why why why?

2007-06-04 01:29:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Some more information may be helpful to the asker
1. ==> The buildings did not fall at free fall speeds.
According to NIST, which used seismic recorders & other techniques to measure the time, the exterior panels took 9-11 seconds. Free fall would have taken 8.5 seconds. The inner parts of WTC1&2 (roughly 60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) stood 15 to 25 seconds after collapse initiation before they, too, began to collapse. Thus, nothing unusual was detected. See Point 6 at http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

2.==> Squibs were not observed. Puffs of dust were seen.
The WTC towers were mostly air, having an average density that’s less than balsa wood. This air has to go somewhere during pan-caking, The dust was simply due to air being expressed during pan-caking.

Loizeaux, of Controlled Demolition (which holds world records in demolition) says demolition charges would have produced a far bigger effect than a “puff.” (p.46) . Four executives of world-renowned demolition companies that did NOT participate in the FEMA or NIST studies confirm that the dust was not consistent with demolition charges (Pop Mech, “Debunking 9/11” page 45)

3. ==> No one saw explosions. There were loud sounds but these were consistent with the collapse.

Sounds during a heart-stopping collapse of a massive building can be deceiving. Most importantly, there is hard scientific evidence against explosions & this was publicly published in nationally respected journal “ImplosionWorld” You can see the entire article here: http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf



4. ==> The Towers did not collapse in the same manner. Although they looked similar, the 9/11 Commision report clearly describes how the collapses differed. You can see a film where the Leader of the NIST team explains the differences at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/

5. Most importantly, all experts agree that the planes brought down the towers. Check out:

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--FEMA http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm

--NIST: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
-----
I hope this is useful to you.

2007-06-04 16:56:03 · answer #2 · answered by J 5 · 0 1

The building was not designed to handle the weight without all of the supports. As the intense heat melt supports, the added weight caused the building to quickly to fall. For example, have you ever walked on plywood and it held your weight, but if you jump on it it will break. The added downforce will increase the load. The added load caused the floors below to quickly fail and fall. There is dust on the exterior of every building the sudden movement released it.

2007-06-03 23:33:09 · answer #3 · answered by JJ 2 · 5 0

in the WTC, the 110 floors of staircases were surrounded with concrete and drywall. the collapse created a compacting effect where these elements flattened and spread out when the building fell.

2007-06-03 23:31:08 · answer #4 · answered by Lovely78 3 · 6 0

Put lots of baby powder in a sock. Put the sock on. Hold a bowling ball over that foot. Drop the ball. The dust cloud will answer your question, the pain will remind you it's called gravity.

2007-06-03 23:37:15 · answer #5 · answered by Stand-up philosopher. It's good to be the King 7 · 6 0

OK your right....now what? I think you need ice cream.

2007-06-04 00:12:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ask a structural engineer...he'll tell you how.

2007-06-03 23:28:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

Shut up.

2007-06-03 23:30:42 · answer #8 · answered by me 5 · 7 3

fedest.com, questions and answers