English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9/11 was nearly six years ago. We still haven't caught Osama bin Laden. Does that bother any of you die-hard Bush supporters? Or do you agree with what Bush said back in 2002 that bin Laden's not just not concern?

2007-05-27 18:08:33 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

It doesn't bother me overly much that we haven't caught Bin Laden. I tend to think they're hiding him in Afghanistan, and I am opposed to doing more there than we already are. He is neutralized because of our presence in Afghanistan and Iraq.

2007-05-27 18:14:24 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 1 1

The only people able to fly out of the US after 9/11 were the bin Laden family members. Bush and that family goes way back. Bush takes his friends seriously, like family. He would never harm Osama bin Laden.

2007-05-27 18:12:47 · answer #2 · answered by ToYou,Too! 5 · 5 1

Oh, you don't know? Bin Laden will never be found, because of the Bush business ties to the Bin Laden family....

Follow the money, these elites and their families, rule the world....

2007-05-27 18:16:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Why didnt we assasinate Hussein all those years? We just dont have the intel! Unless people sell him out from within, we may never find him but we sure got close a few times because we were attacked by his personal body guards.

But since Clinton wasnt willing to, at least Bush is. I dont view such things through a political lens. I think thats rather childish. If we catch him, great. The interests of justice are served, not Bush. And if we dont, then thats too bad but its hardly Bushs fault. Its not like it is his job to pour over satelitte photos with a magnifying glass trying to find his hideout which is like a needle in a hay field. Its his job to set policy and he has.

2007-05-27 18:27:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The answer is simple: Capturing bin Laden does not eliminate the threat of terrorist attack against the United States. Frankly, we do not want to commit the time and resources to convince Pakistan to allow our army into the Northern region of their country to root around and hopefully find him.

2007-05-27 18:16:14 · answer #5 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 0 1

So which is it? Did Bin Laden cause 9/11 or did our own Government? Liberals keep switching their story so often I don't know who did what.

2007-05-27 18:24:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

For the same reason the March of Dimes selected birth defects research as its mission, after it had achieved success in eradicating polio in the US.

2007-05-27 18:14:20 · answer #7 · answered by besseta 1 · 0 0

oh exhilaration a end to all wars each and every little thing would be stable interior the international now this1 solitary loony track has been netted oh exhilaration and peace cometh to all yet no longer till GB And TB are made redundant besides? oh hell no exhilaration is nigh.

2016-10-06 04:15:00 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Two words: George Bush

2007-05-27 18:13:49 · answer #9 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 4 2

Bush still needs OBL to instill fear in the hearts of Americans. He will not go after him, he hasn't yet, like he promised - Dead or Alive.

2007-05-27 18:13:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers