Uh... it's been proven.
2007-05-15 06:57:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Winette 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I can give you two answers. The first answer is my own personal theory. The second answer is from something I learned from a science documentary on TV soon after I had created my own theory.
The First Answer:
1) Think of space as being divided into two sections. The first section is white space. White space is a space that has an unlimited and an infinite amount of material that goes on forever. (So with in white space, with there being an unlimited and an infinite amount of material that goes on forever that also means that the concept of time is irrelevant.) The second section is black space. Black space is a space that is infinitely empty forever and ever. Now two things could have happened. The first thing that could have happened is that a particle from white space had been introduce into black space and at that point the that one particle had exploded into the BIG BANG which had occurred around 13 to 15 billion years ago. The second thing that could have happened is that white space could have introduced a leakage into black space thus creating not only the BIG BANG (or a BIG LEAK) but also creating all of the particles in our universe that had followed immediately after the BIG BANG (or a BIG LEAK). At the point that any amount of white space enters into black space is the same point that we begin to measure the age of our universe.
(Keep in mind that since white space and black space are both infinite, it also means that there may be an infinite number of universes spread out all over the place at any given time.)
The Second Answer:
2) The second answer is that our universe is one of many universes that have come and gone and that have came and went. For example think of a black hole. A black hole is an object with a gravitational field so powerful that a huge region of space becomes completely engulfed into the black hole. No matter or radiation (including light) that has entered its region can ever escape it. Now the inverse and the opposite end of a black hole is where everything is funneled out. Now when this happens it can be called a white hole. A lot of scientist now believe that the BIG BANG of our universe had been created by the process of a white hole 13 to 15 billion years ago. The funneling between a black hole and a white hole is like an umbilical cord. One theory is that there are a lot of universes, and each universe is trapped inside something like a bubble, and the bubbles are connected through an umbilical cord or through a worm hole. At the point that any amount of material from a black hole exit itself out as a white hole is the same point that we begin to measure the age of our universe.
2007-05-16 03:20:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by yeihezzel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ours is the only universe.
Anything connected to it would also be part of it.
Anything not connected to the universe does not exist.
The concept of a multiverse would require an infinite number of universes some how connected.
I know many people believe in a multiverse but the idea of it just cannot be.
2007-05-15 08:38:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Multiverse
Main article: Multiverse (science)
Some theorists extend their model of "all of space-time" beyond a single connected space-time to a set of disconnected space-times, or multiverse. In order to clarify the terminology, George Ellis, U. Kirchner and W.R. Stoeger recommend using the term the Universe for the theoretical model of all of the connected space-time in which we live, universe domain for the observable universe or a similar part of the same space-time, universe for a general space-time (either our own Universe or another one disconnected from our own), "multiverse" for a set of disconnected space-times, and "multi-domain universe" to refer to a model of the whole of a single connected space-time in the sense of chaotic inflation models.[5]
For example, matter that falls into a black hole in our universe could emerge as a Big Bang, starting another universe. However, all such ideas are currently untestable and cannot be regarded as anything more than speculation. The concept of parallel universes is understood only when related to string theory. String theorist Michio Kaku offered several explanations to possible parallel universe phenomena.
Physicist David Deutsch suggests that a multiverse is a consequence of the many-worlds interpretation, which he considers to be the best alternative explanation to the Copenhagen explanations of Quantum theory first presented by Niels Bohr, over half a century ago.
2007-05-15 06:57:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by beeboroachgoingon197 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is absolutely possible. There is no way(currently) to prove whether there are or aren't additional universes. So it has to remain a possibility.
2007-05-15 07:10:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see any way to rule out the possibility. The question, rather, lies in the realm of probability. How probable is it?
2007-05-15 06:57:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jonathan 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Definitely Possible- another earth like planet has been found.only problem is its hard to research it because its so millions of light years away....
2007-05-15 07:06:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nad 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The odds are there has to be more than one
yet how many in total is anyone's guess
2007-05-15 07:01:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
there is definitely one one more world the space is unlimited we are going to here about living bengs diffrent from us in near future
2007-05-15 07:20:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by happygirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
very possible since at least two satelites have come close to reaching the edges of ours
2007-05-15 06:56:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Unbound Demon 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not possible in this universe, however it might be possible in another universe.
That's a joke.
OK, a bad joke.
2007-05-15 06:57:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
2⤊
1⤋