Because of pressure from the cotton, wood and petro-chemical industries, which didn't want the competition from the hemp industry, as hemp is a superior product to cotton for making textiles & for producing pulp for paper products. - As I understand it the first pair of Levi's were made from hemp.
Legend has it that the outlawing of hemp—which, unlike marijuana contains next to no THC—was a grand conspiracy by the evil petro-chemical industry and their partners in crime, the wood-pulp industry. They apparently felt threatened by the relative cheapness in which hemp’s high-cellulose pulp could be produced in comparison to their own paper products. Great men like William Randolph Hearst stood to lose billions of dollars had hemp been developed to its full post-industrial potential. So this triumvirate of villains allegedly went on a high-falutin’ media campaign to confuse industrial hemp with its soul sister marijuana and made damn sure its cultivation and sale remained illegal.
2007-03-29 06:57:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Charlie L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it started out as mostly being used by a few racial and social subcultures. Then, some fanatics were afraid that its use would spread among the white populace, thereby contaminating them and turning them into the drugged associates of these racial groups. Oh, horror! So, they went on a big publicity campaign of lies and extremely biased innuendo, and got laws passed to make it and other drugs illegal. The sanctity of the white race was therefore saved (in their eyes).
2007-03-29 07:02:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by mattzcoz 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
by using fact there has been a stigma linked to marijuana use by using fact the early nineteenth century. human beings at that element, and regrettably, nonetheless immediately, lump it in with the actual drugs, cocaine, heroin, and so on. i for my area think of it fairly is irresponsible of the yank government to no longer legalize it, exceptionally now. the prospective volume of tax sales from legalizing marijuana is concepts-blowing (pun meant). anybody is gonna smoke it besides, so why no longer make the main of that? I did extremely of self sustaining analyze a on an identical time as lower back in this project. MJ vs alcohol. form of site visitors deaths linked with weed vs alcohol is virtually 80 to a million, with alcohol in the lead. The form of doubtless deadly illnesses which would be attributed to weed vs. alcohol? None for weed. a minimum of a million for alcohol--cirrhosis of the liver. additionally, you may would desire to smoke lots of weed to be as impaired as you're with alcohol on the criminal shrink. yet... it fairly is often been "that evil demon weed", and that i do no longer think of which will exchange. unhappy, too, by using fact our united states would desire to truly use all the money they might get via taxing it.
2016-12-08 13:43:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was part of the reaction to the end of prohibition and the excesses of the 1920's.
2007-03-29 06:38:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by squeezie_1999 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Becuz they're straight up white folks inside the government...CRACKERS
2007-03-29 06:40:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes ok prohibition, but then why is it still illegal ?considering what happened with alcohol
2007-03-29 06:43:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by gands4ever 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism was "defeated" and we needed another war.
2007-03-29 06:48:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sangria 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is a dangerous addictive drug that can cause genetic damage to the user and his/her unborn children and grandchildren. Nuf" said?
2007-03-29 06:38:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Because all the pot smokers were growing up to be liberals.
2007-03-29 06:37:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by arwenlotr2 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
because interdiction is profitable
2007-03-29 06:40:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋