2007-03-24 13:52:31 · 7 answers · asked by 1776_2007 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
He's not going to do that, if he did, that would be political suocide. The Democrats dint turn their back on the troops, just dont want to send more of them to Iraq. I mean, this war is longer than WWII at this point. Time to come home?
2007-03-24 14:00:09 · answer #1 · answered by The HSA Guy 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The only thing he is going to veto is that pathetic pork filled bill the dems are trying to pass. The President supports our troops, unfortunately the dems want the troops and their families to starve.
2007-03-24 14:43:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anyone who would advocate such a thing surely must feel humans are the scourge of mankind,
2007-03-24 14:07:32 · answer #3 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are a sick PUP...how many billions in bribes plus a pull out / surrender date?? Yeah, you libs are so in charge of our safety! (Umm..isn't bribery illegal?) Not whens it's the Libs!!!
2007-03-24 14:01:35 · answer #4 · answered by gary l 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If he did that we would have no more defense against the terrorists wanting to kill us all. That's why he isn't going to do it.
2007-03-24 14:00:27 · answer #5 · answered by A question or two... 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The demoncrats already did that
2007-03-24 13:57:04 · answer #6 · answered by DeuceRider 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
soon.
2007-03-24 14:00:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋