doesnt this just show how lame, controlling, and "push it in your face" the yahoo and hillary crowd is...???? they cant make it on the issues, so i guess they figure they will saturate every market and corner of american life trying to get her elected...not a good sign when you have to resort to financially pushing yourself upon the public at every opportunity...it shows a serious lack of integrity and also a very real sense of insecurity on hillary and her campaign ......yahoo should remain nuetral...of course we know they arent, but they should at least try and give the impression they are trying to foster political debate instead of political brainwashing....
2007-03-22 06:42:28 · 10 answers · asked by badjanssen 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It is quite sad that Hillary will be getting all of her political agenda from a bunch of dweebs on yahoo answers. Says much about how she will run the country.
Picture this question:
Dear Liberal and socialist yahoo answers users. Bill and I have decided we want to improve the environment how should we go about doing that?
or
Dear Liberal and socialist yahoo answer users. Should I invade Iran they have just shot a Nuclear warhead at our country what should I do? ( i really want the support of my people I have another election to win in 4 years you know)
2007-03-22 06:48:52 · answer #1 · answered by Barack O Bankrupt 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They will let any of the candidates do it. Hillary is the only one taking advantage of it thou.
They are using some avenues for advertising that she is not. That's how it works. Are you new to the united states.
2007-03-22 13:45:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because yahoo is in the business of making money. buy your own ad and say what ever you like. making money has nothing to do with politics
2007-03-22 13:52:22 · answer #3 · answered by here to help 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are dozens of political attack ads here every day.
And more than few ads in support of one specific candidate.
So, if Yahoo is allowing them, what makes that one different?
2007-03-22 13:48:49 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Name recognition.
It's a proven fact that the swing voters will vote more for name recognition than they will social issues.
2007-03-22 13:46:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo is fundamentally a liberal search engine. It is fed by Reuters, a blatantly liberal news outlet.
2007-03-22 13:46:08 · answer #6 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
One is not constrained to pay attention to advertising.....
2007-03-22 13:51:33 · answer #7 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GASP! Say it isn't so! Yahoo has a Democratic bias?!?
F*ing pathetic, isn't it?
2007-03-22 13:46:26 · answer #8 · answered by Jadis 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
its been like that from yrs and will be..
2007-03-22 13:45:27 · answer #9 · answered by Marino 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now ---- now ---------------its freedom to advertise.
2007-03-22 13:46:02 · answer #10 · answered by J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋