English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is more effective to deliver children from starvation and neglect?

2007-03-15 05:22:21 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

6 answers

It is part of the elitist conspiracy to keep those they lord over with children. I once talked to a car salesman who told me he would only hire someone with kids to feed because he knew the person would not be able to quit easily. Take a good look at the people who try to say abortion is amoral. These are the same people that have been saying one thing and doing another. These are the people that have been using religion for ages to culturally engineer their slaves.

2007-03-15 12:12:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think you should have proof-read your question before posting it because it doesnt make much sense. But in an attempt to answer what i ASSUME you are asking....i find it to be of vaery good character to adopt children who would have no other chances of bettering their lives.

2007-03-15 05:29:25 · answer #2 · answered by Jaded_Beauty 1 · 0 1

We can't get Americans to use birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancies!
Of course in theory, you are correct. But people can't seem to get the message.

2007-03-15 05:29:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Sterilisation, & condoms to prevent the spread of STD's..
:)

2007-03-15 05:34:53 · answer #4 · answered by viragotriker 3 · 0 0

thrilling question for my first cup of coffee Eartha :-p i'm no longer a large celebrity person... yet i actually think of it relies upon. My impact (like i understand, surprising?) is that Madonna jumped on the memento band wagon. For who knows what motives. yet I surely get a distinctive vibe approximately Brad & Angelina. it is my expertise that they do bypass to the residences of those babies in a concerted attempt to maintain them 'rooted' to their international locations and families. besides as different humanitarian efforts in those international locations. confident, they undertake those babies. yet from all bills those people achieve this plenty extra effective than that. They placed their money & their celebrity the place their mouth is. and a large style of it. "in accordance to tax archives, the couple donated extra effective than $8 million to charity in 2006 on my own." Angelina Jolie has supported right here charities: Afghanistan relief business enterprise Alliance For The lost Boys maximum cancers Schmancer circulate Clinton international Initiative Daniel Pearl foundation Direct substitute docs with out borders international action for babies Human Rights Watch Jolie-Pitt foundation youngsters in want of protection Millennium Promise Alliance Millennium Villages ONE marketing campaign Peace sometime newshounds with out borders Sophie's present UNHCR UNICEF UN Millennium undertaking Yéle Haiti foundation Brad Pitt has supported right here charities: African youngster's Choir Alliance For The lost Boys Ante Up For Africa Boys' and females' golf equipment of Canada toddler locate Ontario treatment Autism Now Daniel Pearl foundation archives Direct substitute Donate existence us of a of america EB scientific examine foundation international action for babies international eco-friendly Human Rights Watch Jolie-Pitt foundation stay 8 Make It surprising Make Poverty history Millennium Promise Alliance Millennium Villages Mineseeker foundation no longer On Our Watch ONE marketing campaign ONE X ONE undertaking A.L.S. surprising To Play image voltaic friends software Sophie's present UN Millennium undertaking international food Programme Yéle Haiti foundation maximum of of their place are egotistical wastes of area. those 2 actual provoke me. JMO.

2016-10-18 11:03:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

education & condoms

2007-03-15 05:29:21 · answer #6 · answered by know it all 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers