English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

True. The difference is the binding energy, which is released when the nucleons are combined, as when hydrogen is combined to make helium in the sun.

2007-03-14 12:47:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you go along the periodic table from hydrogen to the heavy transuranic elements, helium is more stable than hydrogen. When two hydrogens fuse to make helium, a lot of energy is released and the helium nucleus weighs less than the two hydrogens. Then as you continue to heavier elements, they become less stable until you get to element 42; technetium. You have to put energy into lighter elements to fuse them into heavier ones, so two heliums weigh less than the beryllium nucleus they make. From technetium to iron, element 56, the nuclei get progressively more stable. Iron is the most stable of any nucleus. From iron onwards, nuclei get progressively less stable, so a uranium nucleus weighs more than the fragments you get when you split it. The rule is, if you get energy released when you split a nucleus, then the whole weighs more than its parts.

2007-03-14 19:57:04 · answer #2 · answered by zee_prime 6 · 0 0

Generally true. It's called 'fusion' and it's what generates all the energy in a fusion bomb (or 'H' bomb)

HTH ☺

Doug

2007-03-14 19:48:02 · answer #3 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers