Do you believe that Internet content should be subject to censorship by a regulatory body such as:?

Question

Civic Groups
Religious Groups
National Organizations
International Organizations

Answer 1

Absolutely not.

Lack of information and misunderstandings cause most of the conflicts in our world today. The more people have access to unbiased, uncensored information; the more we will realize that we are all share a common goal.

Answer 2

No; it is not censorship. If the government bans your good to talk freely approximately politics, or to placed up your comments at your cost, this is censorship. If Yahoo deletes placed up that isn't violate their community policies or words of provider - which has in all risk exceeded off to maximum folk - this is merely a private employer restricting what you're saying on their internet site at their cost. Their homestead, their regulations, in case you will. i do no longer merely like the way the regulations paintings interior the quite a few arguable boards - they're effectively abused to do away with posts and money owed of folk who get mentioned a great style of circumstances by ability of extremists who disagree with them. in spite of if this is merely a internet site, interior the tip. If I have been king, it could be run in a distinctive way, yet i'm no longer, and that they do incredibly properly. This placed up continues to be here. As for Wikipedia, i've got merely edited issues in my field, that's fairly uncontroversial difficult technology, yet i've got observed that pages tend to be annotated to the effect that this or this is arguable, and that i think of they additionally do a sturdy activity on condition that any one in the worldwide can edit an internet site. nonetheless, there as here, it is not censorship to maintain somebody from modifying, if this is in a roundabout way carried out. it could infrequently times be common that an nameless information superhighway individual is removing your words from an nameless information superhighway website, yet i would not call it censorship. you're unfastened to place up your techniques many places - write a weblog - there is not any decrease to what you're allowed to assert. I proportion your frustration with the device at Y!A, yet selection correct to the semantics.

Answer 3

Absolutely not, defeats the whole intention of the net, which is the free exchange of ideas and ideals.

If you don't agree with them, don't go looking!

However for our more way out bretheren who's thoughts might not be shared by the masses, I do think they should be given their own .??? address. like asmith.zzz or something, so that those people who don't want to see the content can easily block it out.

But the above groups giving censorship, no way, where would it end?

Answer 4

Hello J9,

Heck no! Those organizations can't even censor themselves. Look at how Yahoo! censors here. The Internet is meant for finding information, ideas, many of them alternative ideas. If you restrict that then you are keeping people from a free flow of information.

--Rick

Answer 5

Of course not. But then again, Neither should newspapers, radio shows, and television either. Thats freedom of the press, and is the internet not a digital press? Information and knowledge should never be regulated.

Answer 6

No, I do not. Labels are fine, and age warnings are fine, but no censorship. Period.

Answer 7

Only on websites that are privately owned by them.

Answer 8

Big Brother
Mark of the Beast

Answer 9

No.

Absolutely not.

Answer 10

i think you should do your own homework