There's only one and that would be Ron Paul,would you vote for him?If not why not?If so why?
2007-02-26 11:54:49 · 19 answers · asked by jason s 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
So nice that people can't just answer the question without smart aleck responses.
2007-02-26 12:00:38 · update #1
Actually it's not a problem to me I support our constitution.
2007-02-26 12:01:45 · update #2
Well Man in the box hopefully we will be allowed to see what his stances are.
2007-02-26 12:26:59 · update #3
YES AND RON PAUL IS THAT MAN!!! vote RON PAUL in 2008! his record speaks for itself. I beg you people to vote for Dr. Ron Paul. I don't want to live in a police state!
Ron paul is a libertarian running as a R. thats his only chance. He is not a mainstream republican. don't vote or not vote for someone just because of their party. vote based on the person.
closet democrat? you crazy? he is a TRUE conservative, not a fake or neo-conservative! look him up on youtube! see some of his speeches to congress!
2007-02-26 20:44:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Libertarian all the way baby!!!!
The GOP and Dems have been around too long and have alienated the entire united states. Problem is not enough americans are educated enough about other candidates, its all about media coverage.
Ron Paul is GOP. The GOP doesn't know how to follow the constitution haven't the last 6 years proven that?
2007-02-26 12:08:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it sure would be nice to have a president (and senators, state reps, etc) who weren't crooks and who actually respected our Constitution.
As for Ron Paul: I respect the hell out of his stances on civil liberties and privacy issues, however I don't know enough about his views on education, health care, foreign policy, environment, etc to say that I'd vote for him. I'd have to find out more first.
2007-02-26 12:14:58 · answer #3 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sixteen seconds - i'm no longer being abusive as quickly as I say that that is human beings such as you that Jim Sillars (SNP) became speaking approximately years in the past while he stated approximately a number of Scotland's voters does no longer decrease back Independence (1979) by way of fact "they don't have the bottle". i'm no teenager and that i've got seen how, over some years, the London events have dealt with Scotland as 2nd classification, regarded down on us and held us decrease back. England has an analogous ideas-set in direction of Wales and eire. In Scotland I even have lived by using seeing the decimation of Shipbuilding, the Motor industry, Mining, steel manufacture, the service provider army, and so on, and so on,and so on, the checklist is going on. I 'm fairly specific you does no longer call this "progression", we've in certainty long previous backwards by way of fact of London interference aided and abetted by utilising successive Scottish Secretaries who've replaced their spots in seek of potential and the extreme existence the minute they have been given a flavor of London existence. i'm no longer some loopy SNP enthusiast, i like to seem at concerns in a sparkling easy and that i'll area with any celebration who's speaking experience. i want to be sure Independence by way of fact i know it is going to likely be the main suitable factor for Scotland and we are able to progression if all of us pull mutually. human beings could desire to be below no phantasm that once Scotland's supplies have been used up by utilising the London Treasury our united states of america would be of no further use to them and that they are going to be begging for us to have Independence.
2016-09-29 23:07:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there were any presidential candidates capable of following the constitution we wouldn't need a president. It would be up to the legislative and judicial branches to govern us. Keep asking itself, "could it be worse?' and you will answer yourself, "not really."
2007-02-26 12:04:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes you are correct they wrote it so that we could have better lives and so that we would be equal and now they pretend that it doesnt even matter that it was written anymore so if i was of age i would vote for someone that will follow it im only 17 and i have an opinion for the world to hear and know about.
2007-02-26 12:01:33 · answer #6 · answered by uradellc 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What would really be nice is if the person who won the popular vote was allowed to be the president.
2007-02-26 12:08:46 · answer #7 · answered by sexmagnet 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not Ron Paul, I live in Texas, guys a closet Democrat.
2007-02-26 11:59:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
We did. In 2000 & 2004.
I don't want him, he is an isolationist & that would be a disaster in the 21st century.
2007-02-26 12:22:03 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You did, at least twice.
The problem is that following the Constitution doesn't necessarily mean agreeing with you.
That is a problem isn't it?
2007-02-26 11:59:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋