I really wish that our country could vote on issues instead of only getting to vote between two or three candidates and then being stuck with such lame compromises.
Just seems like so many major issues, we have no say as regular citizens.
2007-02-26 06:44:09 · 13 answers · asked by Terri I 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No reason at all right now, since Congress has changed to a Democrat majority. Give them time to ground the evidence, they have only been in control for less then 2 months now.
2007-02-26 07:42:10 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Democrats don't want a backlash for impeaching. Believe it or not, there is a long list that has been submitted by members of Congress filled with impeachable offenses (if you don't believe me, ask Harpers, they reported it). There is substantial evidence that election fraud occured in both 2000 and 2004. The reason this hasn't been acted on is that there is not a desire within the Democratic Party to face the possible backlash and division within the party that it could create.
2007-02-26 14:56:22 · answer #2 · answered by Ranavain 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You had your say if you voted. Plus, you need a reason to impeach a president. Not a lame Democratic, excuse.
2007-02-26 14:52:43 · answer #3 · answered by "El Padrino" 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, there is a reason he can't be impeached--he hasn't broken any laws! Believe it or not, Clinton was NOT impeached for getting a little action under the desk in the Oval Office. He was impeached for lying to a special prosecutor under oath, which is illegal and for which he was also disbarred. You may not like what Bush does or even hate the man, himself, but he's not breaking the law because of it.
2007-02-26 14:50:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
If lying to the citizens, failing to secure the country from illegals, failing to listen to those who voted him in office, corruption in office, destroying the economic future of this country, outing a CIA operative isn't enough, this country is worse off then we know. They passed laws to protect themselves from releasing classified material. Who would you want to take their place? There isn't an honest one in the bunch. Be an informed voter and pray they don't do too much more damage in the next two years.
2007-02-26 15:03:41 · answer #5 · answered by jackie 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes, there has to be an impeachable offense and there has not been one. If there was ceratinly the left wing liberals would have been all over it now that they have control of the Congrees, but they don't and to pursue it would be political suicide!
2007-02-26 14:51:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It's not lawful for any citizen to get rid of an endangered species, and he's the only monkey left that walks upright.
2007-02-26 14:55:51 · answer #7 · answered by Earl W 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It would be impossible to get 75% of the Senate to vote for removal from Office.
Do you really want Chaney in charge?
2007-02-26 14:48:03 · answer #8 · answered by Greg P 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
first you'd need a reason why he should be impeached in the first place. you can't just impeach someone because you don't agree with their political views.
2007-02-26 14:52:09 · answer #9 · answered by Joe M 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Another sore loser! Why can't you guys just accept that you lost in 2004, and let democracy work the way the founders intended.
2007-02-26 14:50:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anne Marie 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋