i mean is it faster? or what? or no? like you don't really feel it?caz i am bulding a computer for video editing...i just want to know should i go with 2.8 or 3.4 ghz....?
and for this do i have to have a guniune window or copy of window is enugh caz to be honest i don't have money to pay for orginal window......thanks
2007-02-15 18:01:09 · 5 answers · asked by hani e 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Desktops
If the copy of windows is yours, it should be fine, just use the validate by phone instead of online. You WILL notice the difference between 2.8 and 3.4 Ghz. Mostly during rendering times and burning times for DVDs. Also, if you use adobe, you'll notice the difference in program startup times.
2007-02-15 18:06:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The difference between 2.8 Ghz and 3.4 Ghz is just minimal. If in case you don't know, a 2.8 Ghz CPU speed is above par coz the standard speed is i think 2.0 - 2.2 Ghz. If you are on video editing, what you need the most is a higher RAM. 512 MB of ram is standard, but having a 1 Gig RAM is highly recommended if you're gonna be doing heavy video editing work. Consider also the video card. A 512 MB videocard should do, but if you only got 256 MB, it's still ok. These set-up works well on Adobe Premiere and Final Cut. But if you're also going to use After Effects, that's another story...
2007-02-15 18:14:18 · answer #2 · answered by Chuwariwap 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well if you are building a computer for that I would go for 3.4GHZ and at least a 120Gb hard drive or more and with window Xp or Even window 98 maybe be OK but I would go with window xp either home or professional
2007-02-15 18:10:29 · answer #3 · answered by terrybradley64 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im assuming you are refering to those old Intel CPU's, then no i dont think it would make a huge difference.
2007-02-15 22:04:03 · answer #4 · answered by noname 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
fwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegwfwegwegwegwegwegwegwegegw
2007-02-15 18:08:18 · answer #5 · answered by cooltey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋