Who totally disagree's of what our President is doing in Iraq????

Question

I hate bush with a passion, I am a proud democrat, he aint my president but I do support our efforts in Iraq, but our president needs to know is that you can't win the war on terror it aint gonna happen in a million years. I am sorry to say but it's the truth, Terror is here to stay whether we like it or not. Let's train the iraq army and get the hell out of there, It seems like we are fighting more then training.

Hillary 08 :)

Answer 1

Whoever said 80% of Americans don't agree with Bush needs to take a math class. And as for your question...You are so biased against the president...not to mention childishly biased...you can't even reason. I do believe training the Iraq army is exactly what they are trying to do. But the country had been suppressed for so long, and there are so many insurgents, it's hard to tell what is what over there. I have friends currently serving. And their take on it is that there are many positive changes happening. Unfortunately, with all the unrest, they aren't happening overnight. It's kind of like trying to help people get off welfare. Everything is in place, but you can only do so much. Not like you can train someone today and they can take charge tomorrow. But if you think there is such an easy answer, I am sure they would be happy to have a helping hand. I will be happy to buy you a ticket.

Answer 2

I disagree with the act of war on moral principles.

However, now that the Congress of the United States voted with a super majority to authorize the President to use military action against Iraq we are stuck in that quagmire until the job is done. It was not part of the war on terror but thousands of dead Al-Qaeda prove it has indeed become that.

Syria and Iran would decimate Iraq if we were to leave them unprotected. To win and get out requires not just training the Iraqi troops and police, but to also fight the insurgents and terro cells that are being equipped and funded through outside interests.

Leaving Iraq unprotected is as morally objectionable as the senseless war that got us there in the first place. But we have an obligation to see it through. (We're not the French who pack things in and let genocide and starvation rampage through their former colonies.)

Answer 3

We made the terrorist stronger by going into Iraq . You are right about not winning that war . Those people have been fighting for hundreds of years among themselves . It took Saddam to make them stop . He was a cruel and evil man but someone that held them together as a country . He wanted nothing to do with Al Qaeda and didn't have anything to do with 9/11 . Al Qaeda went to Afghanistan to hide and when we invaded Iraq they became bolder and recruited more terrorist easily . And so here we are today .

Answer 4

I too am a democrat and I agree we need to train the people over there, but I also know that Bush didn't send our people over there all by himself, it took congress and the senate's voting for it, for it to happen, he can't do much of anything without their approval. I also know that terrorism will always be a threat but that doesn't mean we shouldn't fight against it. I don't know about everyone else but I don't want those people coming over here, keep the wars in other countries. Do you really want them coming here and killing our children and blowing up our country?

Answer 5

i think of you're asking a loaded question - extra so based on the define, are you a attorney in coaching?: like whilst specific information stations pose the "difficult" question of "So, do you go with for us to win in Iraq?" Technically the respond to your question is confident, ppl hate bush plenty they choose for US to lose. yet those people are as simplistic as people who propose that by using fact somebody disagrees with bush potential that they hate him and subsequently needs to make sure US lose in Iraq. Neither tact is logically sound besides the undeniable fact that that's the place this way of question will take the verbal replace. in my opinion, i'm no longer on the fence yet can not make sure which area i'm on in terms of staying in iraq or chickening out. Australia is interior the warfare besides (no longer that any one is prevalent with) and that i type of think of our PM have been given us in touch so what spectacular can we would desire to depart together as Iraq is actual crammed. on the different hand, why might desire to our squaddies die for something that seems to have no genuine plan?

Answer 6

Bush isnt in Iraq, our troops are, and they make desicions on a personal level each day on how to carry out this "war".
The only way we can win the war on terror is to destroy their ability to fight, and then educated and employ the population to keep them from turning back into terrorists.
Because we pulled out of germany and left them to their own devices, without rebuilding them, WW2 happened.

Answer 7

I think its dumb. How can you win a war when you don't know how to win. When is the war on terror over. There will always be terrorist. Even if we kill every one alive today more will sprout out in their places. But people are dying for a phony war and something should be done about it. America can't play world police. We need to worry about the problems going on in our own country.

Answer 8

The war was based on lies.
Actually, everything these Republicans in power have done over the last 6 years has been based on lies.
I don't hate the President, but I do know that we would be SO much better off if the man most Americans voted for, AL GORE, had been placed in office, as he properly should have been.

Answer 9

I agree terror won't win war at all and bush makes it worse, we need to change something and fast!

Answer 10

i think the people of the usa went to the wrong way to ellect their president they sold the human being of the world to dracula bush !!! we the people of the world think the dracula is story for hoby but in the new wildy world we see the dracula and the emperior of them unfortunataly?!...