Curious since she can't controll her own house. Any women that is that stupid that doesn't admit or realize her sex addicted husband has repeatedly cheated on her and then stands by her man,do we want her as head of state? Do we need all the scandal back in the white house? What new intern will be bill's next victim?Do we want another 4 years spent on covering up scandals? Is Hillary sincere or just politically driven?
2007-01-30 05:01:11 · 38 answers · asked by codeman04 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I am sure she is more fit than the current doofus in charge.
2007-01-30 05:06:07 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Senator Clinton has proved to be a capable politician. I, however, would not ever vote for her because I am a moderate and she is a "in the closet far left". She is also a very "opportunistic" person... but hey, aren't most politicians. It will definitely be an interesting campaign especially being that we are at war with evil men and that Senator Clinton says she knows how to deal with these sorts. OK, that was a cheap shot. Seriously, if she becomes our President the country should support her. This is what a democracy is all about and we need to remember that or else we will probably become a third world country within the next 50 years or so.
2007-01-30 05:13:26 · answer #2 · answered by KnowSomeStuff 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is Bill Clinton the only person who has ever cheated on a spouse? There have been plenty of scandals in the current white house (thankfully no sexual that we know of....don't need those mental pics) Bill Clinton did not have victims, he had partners. Do you seriously think that the Bush white house is not causing scandals and working their hardest to cover them up? And you cannot possibly believe that Bush is politically driven? PLEASE...the real question pertaining to the '08 election is who is the lesser of the two evils? The way I see it Hillary hasn't sent thousands of Americans to their death so that is a major plus in her column, she has a husband who enjoys sex but I don't think he killed anyone while having it!
2007-01-30 05:10:25 · answer #3 · answered by paula0005 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
She is a liar! She has been a senator of NY for so many years now, but I cannot recall if she actually did anything for NY. All she does is give politically motivated speeches while carefully choosing what to say to help her presidential compaign. When she became a NY senator 4-5 years ago, she already knew then that it was simply a safety move before she'd jump into running for president. She never ever had NY on her mind and I don't see how anyone can trust her to lead the country.
But, all this noncense with Bill- it is totally political and irrelevant. It is not about Bill - it is Hillary who wants to present herself as a soft, forgiving woman who gave her mistaken husband a second chance.
And what about right now- she is using this kid whos father just passed away from 9/11-related illnesses and pretends that she cares and publically calls on Bush to meet the guy...She is shameless.
And, did anyone hear her first speech as a presidential candidate? She announced a chilld medical coverage proposal as her presidential theme...Why wouldn't she do it as a NY senator? SHe had plenty of time to introduce this for a state of NY- but why waste such a nice move!
2007-01-30 05:48:08 · answer #4 · answered by BestAndBeyond 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes she is, it is a shame that you say anything about Hilary for standing by her man. If she would have divorced him you would be saying ..."do we want someone in the white house that runs when the going gets tough"
I really don't think Monica was a victim either. She was a young woman that trusted him to do right by her, yea it was wrong but how many other have had affairs?
2007-01-30 05:24:47 · answer #5 · answered by ladydaisy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She could be sincere but is definitely politically driven. I don't know about the rest of America but she's a pushy, controlling, knieving type - and most people I know wouldn't want to be married to her - that's for sure. Are we ready for Hillary as President - I don't think so. So, I'm like - hey - I'm a Republican and not ashamed to say so - so let her run - more power to her! It gives the Republicans a better chance in the election since it will probably be close again. I'd take a male Democrat over a female Republican any day for President and I'm like an across the board Republican the grand majority of the time. People like to think that we are all for women's lib - but I don't think the majority of American's would go for a woman President. Women are so emotional, catty and petty at times - don't let her push the nuke button - when she's having those menopausal ups and downs!!!
2007-01-30 05:09:44 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No, I think the White House would be rocked with additional numerous SCANDALS footed at taxpayer expense. Look at how many scandals Hillary was involved in and is currently involved in. I think she is out for herself and doesn't truly care about anyone else.
2007-01-30 05:26:32 · answer #7 · answered by Someone who cares 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Even though I am not a fan of Hillary's politics, I think her personal life should not be a factor in this election.
Seriously, she's been a senator for 2 years.. how is that enough experience to be president? The only thing she has going for her is that she is a woman, so many uneducated women will vote for her.
I
2007-01-30 05:11:44 · answer #8 · answered by badneighborvt 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You conservatives are all about "honoring marriage", "protecting the sanctity of marriage" and looking down on those who divorce as people with no morals. Especially religious conservatives.
They you are hypocritical and trash Hillary because she did just what you said she should do- "stand by her man"
Remember- you talk about how life was better in the 50's when marraiges stayed together and "liberals" didn't corrupt the value system of Americans. Do you really think infidelity didn't exist in the 50's? NO. Women stayed with their unfaithful husbands because it was porotecting the sanctity of marriage.
If Hillary would have left Bill you be talking about how she has no morals.
BTW: Most U.S presidents have had affairs. They were just kept hidden. Did their wives leave them??
Get a life- is the the only bad thing that you can say about Hillary??
2007-01-30 05:08:54 · answer #9 · answered by Katie 4 · 7⤊ 3⤋
questionable but likely. my main concern would be bill clintons roll as first man. how much influence would he have in her policy and would it be a free for all for the republicans, as far as attacking her "leadership" skills. would bill be the puppet master.and on you last comment, i do not feel any politician is sincere. all are politically driven as noted in the rats jumping ship on the republican side. what is on their mind you ask? i need to get re-elected, whatever it takes. political office, not just a job but a mis-adventure.
2007-01-30 05:21:22 · answer #10 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She's politically driven. If she gets in, there will be plenty more scandals occuring. Both her and her sex addict of a husband have created scandal and I see no reason to believe why she would 'start out fresh' with a clean slate. They both are notorious for causing scandal and I'm sure it'll happen again if she gets in the WH. Watch and see!
2007-01-30 05:07:27 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋