English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Their are a lot of nominations, some including the first woman or first black man.

Now, while many women think its great Hillary is running--how can you be proud of a two-faced liar becoming the first women president. She doesnt have intentions of listening to the people...because sh has told us she would help support the stopping of illegal immigration, yet when with another NY senator-she turned down two ammendents dealing with the protection from illegal immigration.

Then Obama may be the first black man, he has no other platform than that. He doesnt seem to have any plan on what to do with the country.

Seemingly, all other canditates are not as popular as those two. Why cant America vote to put someone who has the knowledge and ability to run our country into presidency?

Last time we had a vote for presidency I was 17, too young to vote between Bush & Kerry. Why is it that in 08, when I am able to vote--I will have to pick from a two-faced woman & a newbie?

2007-01-28 04:34:47 · 13 answers · asked by I Love My Kitties 5 in Politics & Government Elections

Why do we have to change what our fathers of the country had? For over 100 yrs, we have always had a man in office.

Why are people like Hillary & Obama trying to change that? Its history thats been kept for many many years.

2007-01-28 06:12:31 · update #1

13 answers

You don't.... there are many potential candidates "out there". ...whether you vote democratic or republican you will, unfortunately, still be voting for the lesser of the evils!

Have you emailed Hillary or any other candidate with your views on their performance....this is not a right but an obligation for all Americans!

http://www.senate.gov
http://www.house.gov

2007-01-28 04:44:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Obama may be young but he's far from a newbie. He's done great work in Illinois and in the Senate plus he opposed this stupid war from the start. The only reason why politicians now are opposing the war is so that they can get more votes. It's obvious that Obama is wise beyond his years. No one had a problem with Kennedy, so what's so wrong about Obama? He's a great speaker like Kennedy. He's smart and talented. Plus when you listen to him talk, like at the convention, you get a warm feeling like there's hope left after all. We need someone like that, and not other republican idiot. Hopefully people stop listening to the media and smear campaigns and actually look up Barack Obama and listen to what he has to say. OBAMA 08!

2007-01-28 05:21:18 · answer #2 · answered by Sam 2 · 0 0

First of all, don't limit yourself to just the Democratic party. Vote for the candidate that agrees with you on most issues. You gotta do your homework.

I consider myself Republican but they're making it difficult to vote for them this time around. A few years ago Ross Perot was the solution for some people that couldn't find a candidate to support in either of the major parties

When it comes to flip-flopping candidates (like Kerry or Hillary), if you look closely at the voting record of most candidates you'll find
that most of them have done that.

Vote your heart and mind...not your party.

2007-01-28 04:49:48 · answer #3 · answered by Paul H 4 · 0 0

initially do your study to discover the social gathering that "in reality" represents your way of wondering. regularly, Republicans count number on decrease taxes (even no matter if it really is for the wealthy), a lot less authorities (in spite of the undeniable fact that it would want to be troublesome pressed to exhibit it those days) and construction us of a by potential of being company pleasant. Democrats regularly, trust more effective in man or woman rights (now and again on the fee of the final public), taxing the organizations and giving the breaks to the guy. Republicans are regularly more effective conservative (professional existence, constitutional modification defining marriage), Democrats more effective liberal (professional determination, gay rights, stem cellular study) Being an smart individual you'll pick to look into applicants, no longer basically the common ones. And once you've the time artwork to help the single you've faith in. Get your substances from more effective than one venue. FOX information is extremely professional Republican, ABC information somewhat a lot less professional Democrat. yet take each little thing this is reported with a grain of salt, study their balloting historic previous, no longer basically what they say. Their important purpose on the prompt might want to be to get helps, and economic backing to be the single to get the nomination from their social gathering. allow's settle for it, in spite of the undeniable fact that Ralph Nader, Ross Perot and John Anderson can run as Independents out of the important flow events, the most perfect danger for victory is with between both important events. sturdy success such as your determination and welcome to the circus!

2016-10-17 03:50:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Strong personality, honorable and accomplishments (regardless of party affiliation) are what is needed. Neither Bush nor Kerry fit the bill last time around. The two that come to mind that would best fit our need to be respected in the world are McCain and Giuliani. I say this not because of their politics, but because they are strong LEADERS. As a country we need that in order to regain the respect of the world.

2007-01-28 04:41:20 · answer #5 · answered by Beachman 5 · 0 1

unless i missed something this weekend obama is not for sure he is gonna run. hillary may be two faced, but what politician is not? There will have to be someone on the republican ticket. hillary and obama (if he runs) will not make it past the primaries, unfortunately. i would vote for hillary. look into john edwards. i would say he'll be the best bet for a democratic run.

2007-01-28 04:41:41 · answer #6 · answered by summer love 3 · 1 1

Hillary is a far left Liberal wolf in Moderate clothing.

I will vote for John McCain whom gave GWB a serious run for his money in the beginning of the 2000 Republican primary.

He is liberal on social issues yet Conservative when it comes to foreign affairs.

2007-01-28 04:53:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

read up on Giuliani he pulled New York out of a really tough time, and did many great things for New York as well! He's getting my Vote!

2007-01-28 04:46:21 · answer #8 · answered by snickers 3 · 0 2

Rudy Guiliani without a doubt.

2007-01-28 04:49:09 · answer #9 · answered by TCSO 5 · 0 2

You can choose who you like. There are at least a dozen hopefuls out there.

2007-01-28 04:39:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers